Assessment Procedure, Faceless Assessment, Reassessment & Search Block Assessment
An encyclopedic CA Final master compendium covering the entire assessment lifecycle under the Income-tax Act, 2025: mandatory PAN quoting and linking rules (Section 262), Return of Income deadlines and high-value 7th Proviso triggers (Section 263(1)), Belated, Revised, and Defective returns, Updated Return (ITR-U) with additional tax (Sections 263(6) & 267), Modified returns in corporate reorganisations (Section 314), Self-assessment tax (Section 266), Inquiry before assessment & Special Audit (Section 268), Valuation Officer references (Section 269), Summary processing u/s 270(1) and Scrutiny notice time limits (Section 270(9)), Best Judgment Assessment (Section 271), National Faceless Assessment Centre (NaFAC) architecture (Section 273), Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) collegium (Section 275), Income Escaping Assessment / Reassessment code (Sections 279 to 285) with pre-notice inquiries u/s 281 and 3-year/5-year limitation rules u/s 282, Time limits for completion (Section 286), Rectification of mistakes (Section 287), Demand notices (Section 289), Search Block Assessment (Sections 293 to 296), and all 16 ICAI Test Your Knowledge practical questions.
1. Assessment Procedure Architecture & Statutory Scheme
Core Pillars of Tax Compliance & Assessment Lifecycle
The assessment lifecycle represents the adjudicatory machinery through which tax liability is computed, verified, and finalized. Under the Income-tax Act, 2025, the statutory scheme has been re-architected to streamline compliance, enhance digitization, expand faceless operations through the National Faceless Assessment Centre (NaFAC), and institute a robust framework for search block assessments.
PAN allotment, mandatory quoting under Rule 159, Aadhaar linking, inoperative status, and deterrent penalties under Section 467/466.
Mandatory filing, 7th Proviso high-value criteria, Belated (263(4)), Revised (263(5)), Defective (263(7)), and Updated ITR-U (263(6) & 267).
Notice u/s 268(1), Special Audit u/s 268(5), Valuation u/s 269, Processing u/s 270(1), Scrutiny u/s 270(12), Best Judgment u/s 271, and DRP u/s 275.
Income escaping assessment, mandatory Section 281 inquiries, 3-year/5-year limitation codes, and strict time limits u/s 286.
Block period covering 6 preceding AYs plus period up to search, flat 60% tax rate, and streamlined 12-month completion limitation.
Statutory Cross-Reference Mapping: 2025 Act vs 1961 Act
A quick comparative reference table illustrating the corresponding sections between the two enactments:
| Subject Matter | Income-tax Act, 2025 | Income-tax Act, 1961 | Key Statutory Highlights & Scope |
|---|---|---|---|
| Permanent Account Number (PAN) | Section 262 | Section 139A | Allotment, mandatory quoting in Rule 159 transactions, penalty of ₹10,000 u/s 467. |
| Return of Income & Deadlines | Section 263(1) | Section 139(1) | 31 July (individual/non-audit), 31 Oct (audited/company), 30 Nov (transfer pricing). 7th Proviso triggers. |
| Belated Return | Section 263(4) | Section 139(4) | Filing up to 31st December of AY. Late fee u/s 438 (₹5,000/₹1,000). Carry forward of losses barred. |
| Revised Return | Section 263(5) | Section 139(5) | Filing to rectify bona fide omission/wrong statement up to 31st December of AY or completion of assessment. |
| Updated Return (ITR-U) | Section 263(6) | Section 139(8A) | Window up to 48 months from end of FY succeeding tax year on payment of additional tax (25% to 70%). |
| Defective Return | Section 263(7) | Section 139(9) | 15-day cure notice issued by AO; failure renders return invalid and treated as non-est. |
| Modified Return (Reorganisation) | Section 314 | Section 170A | Filing within 6 months from end of month in which NCLT/Court reorganisation order is passed. |
| Self-Assessment Tax | Section 266 | Section 140A | Mandatory discharge of tax + interest (234A/B/C) + fee (234F) before furnishing return. Assessee in default for shortfall. |
| Inquiry Before Assessment | Section 268 | Section 142(1), (2), (2A) | Notice for production of accounts/documents; Special Audit direction by AO u/s 268(5) with PCIT approval. |
| Summary Processing & Scrutiny | Section 270 | Section 143(1), (2), (3) | Intimation u/s 270(1) within 9 months; Scrutiny notice u/s 270(8)/(9) within 3 months of FY end; Regular order u/s 270(12). |
| Best Judgment Assessment | Section 271 | Section 144 | Ex-parte assessment upon non-compliance with 263(1), 268(1), 268(5), or 270(8). Honest estimate rule. |
| Faceless Assessment Scheme | Section 273 | Section 144B | NaFAC, automated allocation, functional units (AU, VU, TU, RU), elimination of human-interface. |
| Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) | Section 275 | Section 144C | Eligible assessees (non-residents/transfer pricing), draft order, 30 days objections, 9 months binding directions. |
| Reassessment Machinery | Sections 279-285 | Sections 147-151 | Information of escaped income, Sec 281 pre-notice show cause inquiry, 3-year normal / 5-year extended limitation. |
| Search Block Assessment | Sections 293-296 | Chapter XIV-B (158B-158BE) | Restored block assessment regime: 6 AYs + current period, 60% flat tax, completed within 12 months. |
2. Permanent Account Number (PAN): Allotment, Quoting & Penalties
1. Mandatory Application for Allotment of PAN [Section 262(1)]
The following persons are statutorily obligated to apply for allotment of a Permanent Account Number within the prescribed time limits:
| Category of Assessee / Trigger Criteria | Statutory Condition / Threshold | Prescribed Time Limit for Application |
|---|---|---|
| Total Income exceeding Basic Exemption Limit | Total income of the person or total income of any other person in respect of which he is assessable exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax. | On or before 31st May of the Assessment Year for which such income is assessable. |
| Person Carrying on Business or Profession | Total turnover, gross receipts, or sales exceeds or is likely to exceed ₹5,00,000 in any previous year. | Before the end of the financial year in which turnover exceeds ₹5 Lakhs. |
| Charitable or Religious Trust / Institution | Trust or institution required to furnish return of income under Section 263(1)(a)(iii) (Old 139(4A)). | Before the end of the financial year. |
| Financial Entities Entering Specified Transactions | Residents entering into financial transactions of an aggregate value of ₹2,50,000 or more in a financial year. | On or before 31st May of the immediately following financial year. |
| Key Persons in Non-Individual Entities | Managing Director, Director, Partner, Trustee, Author, Founder, Karta, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Officer, or Authorized Signatory of an entity entering into transactions of ₹2,50,000 or more. | On or before 31st May of the immediately following financial year. |
| Persons Entering Prescribed Transactions (Rule 159) | Persons intending to enter into transactions specified under Rule 159 who do not possess a PAN. | At least 7 days before the date on which the person intends to enter into such transaction. |
Voluntary PAN: Any person not covered under the mandatory criteria may voluntarily apply for a PAN, and the Assessing Officer shall allot the same [Section 262(2)].
Single PAN Rule: A person who has been allotted a PAN is strictly prohibited from applying for, obtaining, or possessing another PAN [Section 262(8)]. Possessing duplicate PANs constitutes a statutory violation attracting penalty under Section 467(1).
2. Prescribed Transactions for Mandatory Quoting of PAN [Rule 159]
Under Section 262(1)(f) read with Rule 159 (corresponding to Old Rule 114B), every person must quote their PAN in documents pertaining to the following high-value financial transactions:
| # | Nature of Specified Transaction | Prescribed Monetary Value Threshold | Person Responsible for Verifying PAN |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Motor Vehicle Sale or Purchase | All transactions (other than two-wheeled vehicles). | Seller / Motor Vehicle Dealer / Registering Authority. |
| 2 | Opening Bank Account | Opening an account with a banking company or co-operative bank (other than Basic Savings Bank Deposit Account - Jan Dhan). | Banking company / Co-operative bank. |
| 3 | Credit / Debit Card Application | Making an application to a banking company, co-operative bank, or credit institution for credit/debit card issuance. | Card Issuing Bank / Institution. |
| 4 | Opening Demat Account | Opening a depository account with a depository participant for trading securities. | Depository Participant / SEBI registered intermediary. |
| 5 | Hotel or Restaurant Cash Payment | Payment in cash to a hotel or restaurant against a bill or bills at any one time exceeding ₹1,00,000. | Hotelier / Restaurant Proprietor. |
| 6 | Foreign Travel or Foreign Currency Cash Purchase | Cash payment in connection with travel to any foreign country or purchase of foreign currency exceeding ₹1,00,000 at any one time. | Authorized Dealer / Money Changer / Travel Agent. |
| 7 | Mutual Fund Units Purchase | Payment for purchase of units of a mutual fund exceeding ₹50,000. | Mutual Fund Trustee / Asset Management Company. |
| 8 | Debentures / Bonds Acquisition | Payment for acquiring debentures or bonds issued by a company or institution exceeding ₹50,000. | Company / Institution issuing debentures. |
| 9 | Reserve Bank of India (RBI) Bonds | Payment for acquiring bonds issued by the Reserve Bank of India exceeding ₹50,000. | Reserve Bank of India / Agent Bank. |
| 10 | Cash Deposit in Bank Accounts | Deposit of cash with a banking company / co-operative bank exceeding ₹50,000 during any one day. | Banking company / Co-operative bank. |
| 11 | Bank Draft / Pay Order Cash Purchase | Purchase of bank drafts, pay orders, or banker's cheques in cash for an amount exceeding ₹50,000 during any one day. | Banking company / Co-operative bank. |
| 12 | Time Deposit with Bank / Post Office | Cash or non-cash fixed deposit exceeding ₹50,000 at a time or aggregating to more than ₹5,00,000 during a financial year. | Banking company / Post Master General. |
| 13 | Prepaid Payment Instruments (Wallets) | Payment in cash or by draft aggregating to more than ₹50,000 in a financial year for purchase of prepaid payment instruments. | Banking company / Prepaid Instrument Issuer. |
| 14 | Life Insurance Premium | Payment as life insurance premium to an insurer aggregating to more than ₹50,000 in a financial year. | Insurance Company. |
| 15 | Sale / Purchase of Securities (Unlisted) | Contract for sale or purchase of securities (other than shares) exceeding ₹1,00,000 per transaction. | Stockbroker / Intermediary. |
| 16 | Sale / Purchase of Unlisted Shares | Contract for sale or purchase of shares of a company not listed on a recognized stock exchange exceeding ₹1,00,000 per transaction. | Company / Transfer Agent / Buyer / Seller. |
| 17 | Sale / Purchase of Immovable Property | Sale or purchase of any immovable property where consideration or stamp duty value exceeds ₹10,00,000. | Sub-Registrar / Registrar of Properties. |
| 18 | General Goods & Services (All Others) | Sale or purchase of any goods or services not covered above, where transaction value exceeds ₹2,00,000 per transaction. | Seller / Service Provider. |
Where a person enters into any Rule 159 transaction and does not possess a PAN, he must make a statutory declaration in Form No. 97 giving details of the transaction and verifying his identity and address.
Non-applicability of Rule 159: The requirement of quoting PAN or furnishing Form 97 does not apply to:
• The Central Government, State Governments, and Consular Offices.
• Non-residents in respect of transactions executed through banking channels without business connection in India.
3. Aadhaar Linking & Penalties for Non-Compliance
Inoperative PAN (Section 262 / Rule 114AAA)
Every person allotted a PAN as on 1st July 2017 who is eligible to obtain Aadhaar must link PAN with Aadhaar. Failure to link within the notified date results in the PAN becoming inoperative:
- No Refund Issuance: No tax refund or interest on refund under Section 429 shall be issued.
- Higher TDS/TCS Rates: TDS and TCS shall be deducted/collected at higher rates under Section 396 (Old 206AA) and Section 406 (Old 206CC).
- Reactivation: Can be made operative again upon payment of a prescribed fee of ₹1,000 and intimation of Aadhaar.
Penalty for PAN Default [Section 467(1) / Old 272B]
The Assessing Officer may direct that a person shall pay by way of penalty a sum of ₹10,000 if he:
- Fails to apply for allotment of PAN under Section 262(1).
- Fails to quote PAN in returns, challans, or prescribed transactions under Rule 159.
- Quotes or intimates a PAN which is false, and which he either knows or believes to be false or does not believe to be true.
- Fails to authenticate PAN/Aadhaar or possesses multiple PANs.
Note: Reasonable opportunity of being heard is mandatory before levying penalty under Section 467.
3. Return Filing Mandates, Seventh Proviso Criteria & Statutory Deadlines
1. Who is Statutorily Required to File a Return of Income? [Section 263(1)]
Under Section 263(1), the following entities and persons must furnish a return of income on or before the due date:
Mandatory Filing Regardless of Income / Loss
- Every Company: Whether domestic or foreign, private or public, profit-making or loss-incurring.
- Every Firm: Including a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP), whether reporting total income or loss.
Individuals, HUF, AOP, BOI & AJP
Required to file if total income before giving effect to Chapter VIII-C deductions (Sections 123-135 / Old Chapter VI-A) or capital gains exemption (Sections 70-75 / Old 54, 54B, 54D, 54EC, 54F) exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax:
- Normal Tax Regime: ₹2,50,000 (General) / ₹3,00,000 (Senior Citizen ≥ 60) / ₹5,00,000 (Super Senior Citizen ≥ 80).
- Default Concessional Regime (Section 115BAC): ₹3,00,000 (Basic Exemption limit for all individuals/HUFs).
Resident with Foreign Assets / Signing Authority (4th & 5th Proviso)
A resident and ordinarily resident (ROR) individual must mandatorily file a return of income, even if his total income is below the taxable limit, if he:
- Holds, as a beneficial owner or otherwise, any asset (including financial interest in any entity) located outside India; or
- Has signing authority in any account located outside India; or
- Is a beneficiary of any asset located outside India (unless income from such asset is includible in the hands of the beneficial owner).
2. Seventh Proviso High-Value Expenditure & Transaction Triggers
Under the Seventh Proviso to Section 263(1) read with Rule 160 (Old 7th Proviso to Section 139(1) read with Rule 12AB), any person who is not otherwise required to file a return must mandatorily furnish a return of income if during the previous year he satisfies any of the following high-value financial criteria:
| Criteria / Nature of Transaction | Statutory Threshold (Previous Year) | Objective & Tax Compliance Rationale |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Current Account Bank Deposits | Aggregate deposits in one or more current accounts with a banking company or co-operative bank exceeding ₹1 Crore. | Detects undeclared high-volume business receipts routed through banking channels. |
| 2. Foreign Travel Expenditure | Expenditure incurred for travel to a foreign country for himself or any other person exceeding ₹2,00,000. | Captures high lifestyle expenditure disproportionate to declared zero/low income. |
| 3. Electricity Consumption Charges | Expenditure incurred towards consumption of electricity exceeding ₹1,00,000 in aggregate during the previous year. | Household/commercial power tariff tracking reflecting affluent consumption standard. |
| 4. Business Turnover / Gross Receipts | Total sales, turnover, or gross receipts in business exceeding ₹60,00,000 during the previous year. | Mandatory trail for substantial unorganized trade even if claiming lower presumptive income. |
| 5. Professional Gross Receipts | Total gross receipts in profession exceeding ₹10,00,000 during the previous year. | Ensures high-earning professionals enter the direct tax net. |
| 6. Aggregate TDS and TCS Suffered | Aggregate of tax deducted at source (TDS) and tax collected at source (TCS) during the year is:
• ₹25,000 or more (for non-senior citizens); or • ₹50,000 or more (for resident senior citizens ≥ 60 years). |
Correlates deduction credits with reported income filings. |
| 7. Savings Bank Account Deposits | Aggregate deposits in one or more savings bank accounts ₹50,00,000 or more during the previous year. | Monitors accumulation of large non-current bank funds. |
3. Statutory Deadlines for Filing Return of Income [Explanation 2 to Section 263(1)]
The "due date" for filing the return of income under Section 263(1) depends on the legal status and audit obligations of the assessee:
| Class of Assessee | Statutory Due Date | Conditions & Clarifications |
|---|---|---|
| Companies (Domestic & Foreign) | 31st October of AY | Every company is mandatorily subject to statutory audit under the Companies Act, 2013 and tax audit u/s 63. |
| Non-Corporate Assessees Subject to Audit | 31st October of AY | Any person (Individual, HUF, Firm, LLP, Trust) whose accounts are required to be audited under the Income-tax Act (e.g., Section 63 / 44AB) or any other law. |
| Partner of an Audited Firm | 31st October of AY | Partner of a firm whose accounts are required to be audited under Section 63 or any other law (including the spouse of such partner if governed by Portuguese Civil Code). |
| Transfer Pricing Assessees (Section 181 / 92E) | 30th November of AY | Assessees required to furnish an accountant's report in Form 3CEB in respect of international transactions or specified domestic transactions. |
| All Other Assessees (Non-Audit Cases) | 31st July of AY | Salaried employees, small business/professionals under presumptive taxation (Sections 59/60 / 44AD/44ADA), and non-audited individuals/HUFs. |
4. Belated, Revised, Defective & Reorganisation Returns
1. Belated Return of Income [Section 263(4) / Old 139(4)]
If an assessee fails to furnish the return of income within the statutory due date prescribed under Section 263(1), he may furnish a belated return at any time:
On or before 31st December of the relevant Assessment Year, OR before the completion of assessment, whichever is earlier.
Example: For Tax Year 2026-27 (AY 2027-28), the last date for filing a belated return is 31st December 2027.
Severe Consequences of Filing a Belated Return:
Forfeiture of Loss Carry Forward
Under Section 121 (Old Section 80), business losses (other than unabsorbed depreciation) and capital losses cannot be carried forward if the return is filed belatedly. Only loss from house property and unabsorbed depreciation may be carried forward.
Mandatory Late Fee (Sec 438)
Late fee under Section 438 (Old 234F) is levied:
• ₹5,000 if total income exceeds ₹5,00,000.
• ₹1,000 if total income does not exceed ₹5,00,000.
Interest under Section 423 (234A)
Interest @ 1% per month or part of a month is charged on the amount of unpaid tax from the day immediately following the due date under Section 263(1) to the date of furnishing the return.
2. Revised Return of Income [Section 263(5) / Old 139(5)]
If any person, having furnished a return under Section 263(1) or Section 263(4), discovers any omission or wrong statement therein, he may furnish a revised return:
At any time on or before 31st December of the relevant Assessment Year, OR before the completion of assessment, whichever is earlier.
Key Legal Attributes of a Revised Return:
- Bona Fide Error: The discovery must arise from an inadvertent error, omission, or bona fide mistake. A deliberate concealment cannot be cured by a revised return.
- Belated Return Can be Revised: An assessee who filed a belated return under Section 263(4) is fully eligible to file a revised return under Section 263(5).
- Total Substitution: Once a revised return is validly filed, the original return is completely superseded and effaced. The assessment proceeds solely on the basis of the revised return.
- Multiple Revisions: An assessee can revise a return multiple times, provided every revision occurs within the statutory deadline.
Comparative Analysis: Belated vs Revised Return
| Feature | Belated Return [263(4)] | Revised Return [263(5)] |
|---|---|---|
| Pre-requisite | No return filed by 263(1) due date. | Return already filed u/s 263(1) or 263(4). |
| Carry forward of loss | Barred u/s 121 (except HP / depreciation). | Permissible if original return was timely filed. |
| Late fee u/s 438 | Mandatorily attracted. | No additional fee if original was timely. |
| Cut-off Date | 31st Dec of AY or assessment. | 31st Dec of AY or assessment. |
3. Defective Return of Income [Section 263(7) / Old 139(9)]
Where the Assessing Officer considers that the return of income furnished by the assessee is defective, he may intimate the defect to the assessee and give him an opportunity to rectify the defect within 15 days from the date of such intimation (or such extended period as granted upon application).
| Defect Category | Statutory Description of Defect | Consequence if Not Rectified |
|---|---|---|
| Incomplete Schedules | Annexures, statements, and columns in the return relating to computation of income, tax, allowances, and exemptions are not duly filled. | If not cured within 15 days, the return is treated as INVALID RETURN (VOID AB INITIO) and the provisions of the Act apply as if the assessee had failed to furnish the return. |
| Unattached Tax Audit Report | Accounts are audited under Section 63, but the audit report and audited financial statements are not furnished before or along with the return. | |
| Missing Financial Statements | Regular books maintained, but Balance Sheet, Profit & Loss Account, and partner capital accounts not uploaded. | |
| Self-Assessment Tax Unpaid | Taxes and interest payable under Section 266 on self-assessment have not been discharged prior to filing. |
Where the assessee rectifies the defect after the expiry of 15 days or the extended period, but before the assessment is made, the Assessing Officer has discretionary power to condone the delay and treat the return as a valid return.
4. Modified Return on Business Reorganisation [Section 314 / Old 170A]
Section 314 provides an enabling mechanism for successor entities involved in business reorganisations (amalgamation, demerger, merger) sanctioned by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) or High Court:
Scope & Eligibility
- Applies where a business reorganisation order is sanctioned by NCLT, High Court, or Adjudicating Authority.
- Prior to the order, the predecessor or successor company had already furnished a return of income under Section 263.
- The successor entity is required to furnish a modified return to reflect the approved scheme of reorganisation.
Statutory Limitation & Assessment
- Time Limit: Modified return must be furnished within 6 months from the end of the month in which the order of sanction was issued.
- Assessment: If assessment is completed, the AO shall modify or recompute the assessment order in accordance with Section 314. If assessment is pending, the AO passes the order based on the modified return.
5. Updated Return (ITR-U) & Additional Tax Computation
1. Concept, Eligibility & Time Limits for Updated Return [Section 263(6)]
Section 263(6) introduces a vital taxpayer-friendly compliance window allowing any person to furnish an Updated Return (ITR-U) of his income, whether or not he has already furnished a return under Section 263(1) (regular), Section 263(4) (belated), or Section 263(5) (revised) for that tax year.
Under the Income-tax Act, 2025: An updated return can be furnished at any time within 48 months from the end of the financial year succeeding the relevant tax year.
(Note: Under the 1961 Act, Section 139(8A) provided a window of 24 months from the end of the relevant Assessment Year).
Non-Eligibility & Statutory Bars on Filing Updated Return:
An updated return CANNOT be furnished if any of the following negative conditions apply:
Fundamental Income / Tax Outcome Bars
- Loss Return: The updated return is a return of loss.
- Reduction of Tax Liability: It has the effect of decreasing the total tax liability declared in an earlier return filed u/s 263(1), (4), or (5).
- Increase in Refund: It results in an enhancement or fresh claim of refund due to the assessee.
- Second Update Bar: An updated return has already been furnished for that tax year (only ONE updated return is permissible per tax year).
Search, Survey & Enforcement Proceedings Bars
- Search / Requisition: A search is initiated u/s 247 (132) or books/assets requisitioned u/s 248 (132A) for the year of search or 2 preceding AYs.
- Survey: A survey is conducted u/s 249 (133A) (other than TDS/TCS survey).
- Pending Adjudication: Any assessment, reassessment, recomputation, or revision is pending or completed for that year.
- Prosecution / Special Acts: Information received under PMLA, Black Money Act, Benami Law, or DTAA communicated to AO, or prosecution initiated.
2. Computation of Tax & Additional Tax Payable [Section 267]
Under Section 267, no updated return shall be valid unless it is accompanied by proof of payment of self-assessment tax, interest, late fees, and the prescribed additional income-tax.
| Filing Time Window (Income-tax Act, 2025) | Additional Tax Rate | Statutory Base for Percentage Computation |
|---|---|---|
| Within 12 months from the end of the financial year succeeding the relevant tax year | 25% | Aggregate of Tax and Interest payable on the additional / total income disclosed in the updated return. |
| After 12 months but within 24 months from the end of the FY succeeding the relevant tax year | 50% | Aggregate of Tax and Interest payable on the additional / total income disclosed in the updated return. |
| After 24 months but within 36 months from the end of the FY succeeding the relevant tax year | 60% | Aggregate of Tax and Interest payable on the additional / total income disclosed in the updated return. |
| After 36 months but within 48 months from the end of the FY succeeding the relevant tax year | 70% | Aggregate of Tax and Interest payable on the additional / total income disclosed in the updated return. |
Under the Income-tax Act, 1961 (Section 140B), the window was restricted to 24 months with two tiers: 25% if filed within 12 months from the end of the relevant AY, and 50% if filed between 12 and 24 months. The Income-tax Act, 2025 expands the horizon to 48 months with extended slabs of 60% (24 to 36 months) and 70% (36 to 48 months).
ICAI Statutory Illustration: Updated Return Computation
Facts: Mr. X desires to furnish his updated return for Tax Year 2026-27. Upon computation, he is liable to pay ₹2,50,000 towards tax and ₹35,000 towards interest, after adjusting prepaid taxes and taxes paid on any earlier return.
Requirement: Determine whether Mr. X can furnish an updated return and compute the additional tax payable as on:
(i) 31.03.2029
(ii) 28.02.2031
(iii) 31.05.2031
Also evaluate whether the answer would change if a reassessment notice under Section 280 was served on 23.07.2030.
| Date of Filing | Limitation Period / Applicable Slab | Eligibility & Additional Tax Calculation |
|---|---|---|
| (i) As on 31.03.2029 | Within 12 months from end of FY succeeding TY (FY 2027-28 ends 31.03.2028 → 12 months expire 31.03.2029). |
Eligible. Applicable rate: 25%. Additional Tax = 25% × (₹2,50,000 + ₹35,000) = 25% × ₹2,85,000 = ₹71,250. Total Payable = ₹2,85,000 + ₹71,250 = ₹3,56,250. |
| (ii) As on 28.02.2031 | Between 24 and 36 months from end of FY succeeding TY (i.e., after 31.03.2030 but before 31.03.2031). |
Eligible. Applicable rate: 60%. Additional Tax = 60% × (₹2,50,000 + ₹35,000) = 60% × ₹2,85,000 = ₹1,71,000. Total Payable = ₹2,85,000 + ₹1,71,000 = ₹4,56,000. |
| (iii) As on 31.05.2031 | Between 36 and 48 months from end of FY succeeding TY (i.e., after 31.03.2031 but before 31.03.2032). |
Eligible. Applicable rate: 70%. Additional Tax = 70% × (₹2,50,000 + ₹35,000) = 70% × ₹2,85,000 = ₹1,99,500. Total Payable = ₹2,85,000 + ₹1,99,500 = ₹4,84,500. |
If a notice under Section 280 (Old Section 148) was issued/served on 23.07.2030 for TY 2026-27, reassessment proceedings are deemed to be pending. Consequently, by virtue of the statutory exclusion in Section 263(6), Mr. X is strictly disqualified from furnishing an updated return on 28.02.2031. Any updated return filed after service of Section 280 notice is invalid and treated as non-est.
6. Tax Return Preparers, Verification & Self-Assessment Tax
1. Tax Return Preparers (TRP) Scheme [Section 264 / Old 139B]
Section 264 empowers the CBDT to frame a scheme enabling specified classes of persons to prepare and furnish their returns of income through authorized Tax Return Preparers (TRPs).
Eligible Persons
Only Individuals and Hindu Undivided Families (HUFs) are eligible to prepare and furnish their return of income through a Tax Return Preparer.
Statutorily Ineligible Persons
The following assessees CANNOT furnish their returns through a TRP:
- Any Company (Domestic or Foreign).
- Any Person liable to Tax Audit: A person whose accounts are required to be audited under Section 63 (Old 44AB) or any other law.
- Non-Residents: Any person who is not a resident in India during the previous year.
A TRP is an individual who has been issued a Tax Return Preparer Certificate by the prescribed intermediary. However, the following professionals cannot act as TRPs: (i) Any Chartered Accountant; (ii) Any legal practitioner; (iii) Any employee of the specified intermediary.
2. Persons Authorized to Verify & Sign the Return [Section 265 / Old 140]
A return of income must be authenticated and verified by the authorized signatory prescribed under Section 265. A return signed by an unauthorized person is invalid and void ab initio:
| Taxpayer Entity | Primary Authorized Signatory | Alternative Signatory (Contingency Rules) |
|---|---|---|
| Individual | The individual himself. |
• If absent from India: Individual himself or person holding valid Power of Attorney (POA). • If mentally incapacitated: Legal Guardian or competent manager. • If deceased: Legal Representative. • Any other reason: Duly authorized POA agent. |
| Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) | Karta of the HUF. | If Karta is absent from India or mentally incapacitated: Any other adult member of the HUF. |
| Company (Domestic) | Managing Director (MD). |
• If MD unavailable for unavoidable reason or no MD: Any Director. • If in liquidation: Liquidator. • If CIRP under IBC 2016: Insolvency Professional / Resolution Professional. |
| Company (Non-Resident) | Person holding valid Power of Attorney (POA) from the non-resident company. | If managed in India: Principal Officer or Director. |
| Firm / LLP | Managing Partner (Firm) / Designated Partner (LLP). | If unavailable for unavoidable reason or no Managing/Designated Partner: Any Partner. |
| Local Authority | Principal Officer. | Designated municipal authority. |
| Political Party | Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of such party (whether designated Secretary or any other name). | No alternative delegation permissible. |
| Any Other Association / Trust | Principal Officer or Trustee or competent member. | Person holding valid authorisation. |
3. Self-Assessment Tax Payment & Shortfall [Section 266 / Old 140A]
Before furnishing any return of income under Section 263 or Section 267, the assessee must determine and pay the Self-Assessment Tax together with interest and fee payable for any delay.
Self-Assessment Computation Mechanism
| Tax Payable on Total Income Declared | ₹ A |
| Less: Advance Tax Paid | (₹ B) |
| Less: TDS and TCS Credit Claimed | (₹ C) |
| Less: Relief under Section 150/151 (Old 89, 90, 91) | (₹ D) |
| Less: MAT / AMT Credit u/s 177/179 (Old 115JAA/JD) | (₹ E) |
| Net Tax Payable | ₹ F |
| Add: Interest u/s 423 (234A), 424 (234B), 425 (234C) | ₹ G |
| Add: Late Filing Fee u/s 438 (234F) | ₹ H |
| Total Self-Assessment Liability (F + G + H) | ₹ Net Payable |
Statutory Order of Shortfall Appropriation
Where the amount paid by the assessee falls short of the aggregate liability, Section 266(2) prescribes a mandatory waterfall of appropriation:
Any payment is adjusted first towards fee payable under Section 438.
Remaining amount is adjusted towards interest under Sections 423, 424, and 425.
Any remaining surplus is appropriated towards the principal tax liability.
If the assessee fails to pay the whole or any part of self-assessment tax, interest, or fee, he shall be deemed to be an assessee in default under Section 389 (Old 220), triggering recovery proceedings and penalty.
7. Inquiry Before Assessment, Special Audit & Valuation References
1. Inquiries Before Assessment & Notice to Produce Accounts [Section 268(1)]
Under Section 268(1), for the purpose of making an assessment under the Act, the Assessing Officer may serve a notice on any person who has furnished a return or to whom the time allowed for furnishing return has expired:
Notice to File Return
Requiring him, if he has not furnished a return by the due date, to furnish a return of income or loss in the prescribed form and verified in the prescribed manner within the time specified in the notice.
Production of Accounts / Records
Requiring him to produce, or cause to be produced, such accounts or documents as the AO may require.
Statutory Restriction: AO cannot require production of books of accounts relating to a period more than 3 years prior to the previous year.
Written Statements & Assets
Requiring him to furnish in writing verified information, statements, or lists of assets and liabilities.
Prior Approval: Statement of assets and liabilities not included in accounts requires prior approval of Joint Commissioner.
2. Direction for Special Audit by Chartered Accountant [Section 268(5) / Old 142(2A)]
If at any stage of the proceedings, having regard to the prescribed statutory criteria, the Assessing Officer is of the opinion that it is necessary, he may direct the assessee to get his accounts audited by an accountant nominated by the Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner / Commissioner:
| Statutory Pre-requisites for Direction | Procedural Safeguards & Natural Justice | Remuneration & Expenses Allocation |
|---|---|---|
|
The AO must form an objective opinion based on:
• Nature and complexity of accounts; • Volume of accounts or doubt about correctness; • Multiplicity of transactions / specialized business; • In the interest of revenue. |
Mandatory Opportunity of Hearing
AO shall NOT direct special audit without giving a reasonable opportunity of being heard to the assessee. Sahara India Firm v. CIT (2008) 300 ITR 403 (SC): Direction without hearing violates natural justice and is void. |
Borne by Central Government
The expenses of, and incidental to, the special audit (including remuneration of the CA) shall be determined by the PCIT/CIT and paid entirely by the Central Government. The assessee cannot be burdened. |
The Chartered Accountant must furnish the special audit report within the period specified by the AO (maximum up to 180 days from the date of receipt of the direction by the assessee). The period taken for special audit is excluded while computing the limitation period for completing the assessment under Section 286.
3. Estimation of Value of Capital Assets by Valuation Officer [Section 269 / Old 142A]
For the purpose of assessment or reassessment, the Assessing Officer may refer to the Valuation Officer to make an estimate of the value of any asset, property, or investment, including the fair market value of any asset.
Powers & Procedure of Valuation Officer
- The Valuation Officer has the power to inspect any books of account, enter property, inspect assets, and take measurements or samples.
- The Valuation Officer must give notice to the assessee and provide an opportunity of being heard before estimating value.
- The Valuation Officer must send a copy of the valuation report to the AO and the assessee within 6 months from the end of the month in which reference is made.
Evidentiary Value & Opportunity
- The Assessing Officer may, on receipt of the report, give the assessee an opportunity of being heard and take the valuation report into account in making the assessment.
- The valuation made by the Valuation Officer serves as expert technical evidence for determining full value of consideration, cost of acquisition, or unexplained investment under Sections 68, 69, 69A, or 69B.
8. Summary Processing, Scrutiny Notice & Assessment Orders
1. Summary Processing & Electronic Intimation [Section 270(1) / Old 143(1)]
Every return of income filed under Section 263 or Section 267 is processed by the Central Processing Centre (CPC) electronically. The total income or loss is computed after making only the following specified prima facie adjustments:
| # | Permissible Prima Facie Adjustment | Legal Basis & Statutory Nuances |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arithmetical Errors | Any obvious arithmetical inaccuracy or calculation error apparent in the return of income or accompanied schedules. |
| 2 | Incorrect Claims | An apparent incorrect claim where: (a) information is inconsistent with another entry in the return; (b) required statutory audit report or certificate is not furnished; or (c) claim exceeds statutory ceiling. |
| 3 | Disallowance of Untimely Losses | Disallowance of carry forward of loss under business or capital gains if the return is furnished beyond the due date prescribed under Section 263(1). |
| 4 | Disallowance of Audit Report Items | Disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the tax audit report (Form 3CD) but omitted to be taken into account in computing total income in the return. |
| 5 | Disallowance of Chapter VI-A / SEZ Reliefs | Disallowance of deductions under Sections 127/128/131/132/133 (Old 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID, 80-IE) if the return is furnished after the due date specified under Section 263(1). |
First Proviso to Section 270(1): No adjustment shall be made unless an intimation is given to the assessee of such adjustment either in writing or in electronic mode. The assessee has 30 days from the date of issue of such notice to submit his response. If no response is received within 30 days, the proposed adjustment shall be carried out.
No intimation under Section 270(1) shall be sent after the expiry of 9 months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished.
Example: Return furnished during FY 2026-27 → Intimation must be sent on or before 31st December 2027.
2. Notice for Scrutiny Assessment [Section 270(8) & 270(9) / Old 143(2)]
Where a return has been furnished under Section 263 or Section 267, if the Assessing Officer or NaFAC considers it necessary to ensure that the assessee has not understated income, declared excessive loss, or underpaid tax, he shall serve a notice requiring the assessee to produce books, evidence, or attend proceedings:
NO NOTICE under Section 270(8) SHALL BE SERVED on the assessee after the expiry of THREE MONTHS from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished.
Limitation Illustration
If an assessee files its return for Tax Year 2026-27 on 26th September 2027:
- Return is furnished in FY 2027-28.
- End of the financial year is 31st March 2028.
- Three months expire on 30th June 2028.
- Service Deadline: The scrutiny notice must be served on or before 30th June 2028.
Landmark Jurisprudence on Delayed Notice
Hotel Blue Star / ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC):
The Supreme Court established that service of notice within the statutory limitation period is a mandatory jurisdictional prerequisite. An assessment order passed on the basis of a notice served after the expiry of the statutory deadline is void ab initio.
Section 292BB Deeming Notice Cured: Does not protect the Department if the assessee raises the objection regarding non-service or delayed service before the completion of assessment.
3. Regular Scrutiny Assessment Order [Section 270(12) / Old 143(3)]
After considering the evidence, documents, and hearing the assessee (or through faceless electronic submissions under NaFAC), the Assessing Officer passes a speaking assessment order in writing determining total income or loss and tax payable or refundable.
Supreme Court Doctrine: Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT (2006) 284 ITR 323
Legal Question: Can an Assessing Officer entertain a fresh claim or deduction not claimed in the return of income during scrutiny assessment without filing a revised return?
Supreme Court Ruling:
• The Assessing Officer has no inherent power to entertain a claim for deduction made after the filing of the return, otherwise than by filing a revised return under Section 263(5).
• A letter, written submission, or revised computation furnished during assessment proceedings cannot substitute for a formal revised return.
• Carve-Out for Appellate Authorities: The Supreme Court clarified that this restriction is confined strictly to the Assessing Officer. It does not impinge upon the plenary powers of the CIT(Appeals) or ITAT to admit an omitted bona fide legal deduction upon appeal.
9. Best Judgment Assessment & Directions of Joint Commissioner
1. Best Judgment Assessment (Ex-Parte Assessment) [Section 271 / Old 144]
Section 271 casts a mandatory duty on the Assessing Officer to make the assessment of total income or loss to the best of his judgment and determine the tax payable by the assessee upon the occurrence of any of the following four statutory default triggers:
| Default # | Statutory Default Trigger under Section 271 | Procedural Context & Applicable Section |
|---|---|---|
| Default 1 | Failure to Furnish Return of Income | Assessee fails to furnish a return under Section 263(1) and has not furnished a belated return under Section 263(4) or revised return under Section 263(5). |
| Default 2 | Non-Compliance with Section 268(1) Notice | Assessee fails to comply with all terms of a notice issued under Section 268(1) (to file return, produce accounts, books, documents, or statements). |
| Default 3 | Non-Compliance with Special Audit Direction | Assessee fails to comply with a direction issued under Section 268(5) directing him to get his accounts audited by an accountant nominated by PCIT/CIT. |
| Default 4 | Non-Compliance with Scrutiny Notice Section 270(8) | Assessee fails to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under Section 270(8) (Old 143(2)) requiring attendance or production of evidence. |
Mandatory Opportunity of Showing Cause
The Assessing Officer shall NOT pass a Best Judgment Assessment order without giving the assessee an opportunity of being heard by serving a notice to show cause why the assessment should not be completed to the best of his judgment.
Exception: Notice to show cause is NOT required if a notice under Section 268(1) (notice to produce books or file return) was already served on the assessee prior to making the assessment.
Landmark Judicial Precedents on Best Judgment
- State of Kerala v. C. Velukutty (1966) 60 ITR 239 (SC): The Supreme Court established that best judgment assessment cannot be arbitrary, capricious, fanciful, or punitive. It must be an honest and fair estimate arrived at after considering all relevant material.
- Brij Bhushan Lal Parduman Kumar v. CIT (1978) 115 ITR 524 (SC): Though there is an element of guesswork in best judgment, there must be a rational nexus between the material on record and the estimate of income.
2. Directions of Joint Commissioner in Assessment [Section 272 / Old 144A]
Under Section 272, the Joint Commissioner may call for and examine the record of any pending assessment proceeding and issue directions to the Assessing Officer:
Triggers for Exercising Power
- Suo Motu: On his own motion if deemed fit.
- On Reference: On a reference made by the Assessing Officer handling the assessment.
- On Application by Assessee: Upon an application submitted by the assessee during the pendency of assessment.
Statutory Safeguards & Binding Nature
- Binding on AO: All directions issued by the Joint Commissioner are strictly binding on the Assessing Officer.
- Prejudicial Directions Require Hearing: No direction prejudicial to the assessee shall be issued without giving him a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
- Questions of Fact: No direction can be issued under this section regarding lines of inquiry or questions of fact.
10. Faceless Assessment (NaFAC) & Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP)
1. Faceless Assessment Scheme & NaFAC Framework [Section 273 / Old 144B]
Section 273 codifies the legal architecture of the Faceless Assessment Scheme, designed to impart greater transparency, accountability, and efficiency by eliminating interface between the taxpayer and the tax department:
Identifies issues, seeks information/clarification, analyzes material, and prepares Draft Assessment Order.
Conducts cross-verification, examination of witnesses, electronic inquiry, and books verification.
Provides legal advice, transfer pricing valuation, accounting forensic, and IT systems assistance.
Reviews draft order for statutory compliance, correct facts, judicial rulings, and arithmetical accuracy.
End-to-End Workflow under NaFAC
2. Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) [Section 275 / Old 144C]
Section 275 provides an alternative fast-track dispute resolution mechanism for Eligible Assessees to resolve assessment disputes before final assessment orders are passed:
Who is an "Eligible Assessee"?
- (a) Any Non-Resident or Foreign Company: Any person not resident in India or a foreign company.
- (b) Any Person with Transfer Pricing Variations: Any person in whose case the variation arises as a consequence of the order of the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) passed under Section 181 (Old 92CA).
Collegium of the DRP
The Dispute Resolution Panel is a collegium comprising three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners of Income-tax constituted by the CBDT.
Section 275(19) Carve-Out: The provisions of Section 275 shall NOT apply to any block assessment proceedings under Section 294 / 295.
Procedural Roadmap & Statutory Timelines:
| Stage / Action | Statutory Mechanism & Action Required | Applicable Time Limit |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Forwarding Draft Order | AO forwards a Draft Assessment Order to the eligible assessee if he proposes to make any variation prejudicial to him. | Within the limitation period for assessment. |
| 2. Assessee's Response |
The assessee has two options:
• Option A: File acceptance of variations with AO; OR • Option B: File Objections with DRP and AO. |
Within 30 days of receipt of the draft assessment order. |
| 3. Issuance of Directions by DRP |
DRP considers objections, records, and evidence. DRP may confirm, reduce, or enhance variations.
Statutory Bar: DRP cannot set aside any variation or remand the matter. |
Within 9 months from the end of the month in which the draft order was forwarded to the assessee. |
| 4. Passing of Final Order by AO | AO passes the Final Assessment Order in conformity with the directions issued by DRP. The directions are strictly binding on the AO. | Within 30 days from the end of the month in which DRP directions are received. |
| 5. No Objections Filed / Acceptance | If the assessee intimates acceptance or no objections are received within 30 days, the AO passes final assessment order. | Within 30 days from end of month of receiving acceptance or expiry of 30-day objection window. |
11. Income Escaping Assessment, Mandatory Inquiries & Time Limits
1. Scope of Reassessment & Escaped Income [Section 279 / Old 147]
Subject to the provisions of Sections 280 to 284, if any income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment for any assessment year, the Assessing Officer may assess or reassess such income or recompute loss or depreciation allowance.
"Information" Triggering Reassessment
The Assessing Officer can initiate reassessment only if he has information suggesting that income chargeable to tax has escaped assessment:
- Information flagged in accordance with the Risk Management Strategy formulated by the CBDT.
- Any audit objection by the Comptroller and Auditor General of India (CAG).
- Information received under an agreement with a foreign country (DTAA / TIEA).
- Information received pursuant to an order passed by a Court, Tribunal, or statutory authority.
Deemed Escapement Scenarios
Income is statutorily deemed to have escaped assessment where:
- No return furnished although total income exceeded the basic exemption limit.
- Return furnished, but no assessment made, and the assessee is found to have understated income or claimed excessive loss, deduction, or allowance.
- Assessment made, but income chargeable to tax has been underassessed, or assessed at too low a rate, or excessive relief/loss allowed.
2. Issue of Reassessment Notice [Section 280 / Old 148]
Before making an assessment, reassessment, or recomputation under Section 279, the Assessing Officer shall serve on the assessee a notice requiring him to furnish a return of income within three months from the end of the month in which such notice is issued, or within such further time as may be allowed.
1. Compliance with Section 281: No notice under Section 280 shall be issued without conducting pre-notice inquiry, issuing a show-cause notice, and passing an order under Section 281.
2. Specified Authority Sanction: Mandatory prior approval of the Specified Authority under Section 284 must be obtained.
3. Mandatory Inquiry & Opportunity Before Notice [Section 281 / Old 148A]
Section 281 creates a robust statutory safeguard preventing arbitrary or fishing reassessments by prescribing a mandatory multi-stage preliminary inquiry:
| Stage | Statutory Requirement | Mandatory Time Frames & Rules |
|---|---|---|
| Stage 1: Preliminary Inquiry | AO conducts inquiry, if required, with prior approval of specified authority, with respect to the information in his possession. | Before issuing show cause notice. |
| Stage 2: Show Cause Notice | AO serves a notice to show cause along with copies of material/information why a notice under Section 280 should not be issued. |
Assessee must be granted a response window of:
• Minimum: 7 days • Maximum: 30 days (or extended time granted upon application). |
| Stage 3: Consideration of Reply | AO considers the reply and submissions furnished by the assessee in response to the show cause notice. | Mandatory application of judicial mind to objections. |
| Stage 4: Speaking Order u/s 281 | AO decides on the basis of material on record whether or not it is a fit case to issue notice under Section 280, with prior approval of specified authority. | Must be passed within 1 month from the end of the month in which reply is received (or expiry of response window). |
The preliminary procedure under Section 281 is NOT required in cases where: (i) A search is initiated under Section 247 (Old 132); (ii) Books/assets are requisitioned under Section 248 (Old 132A); (iii) Information relates to an asset/account seized in search of another person.
4. Time Limits for Notice for Reassessment [Section 282 / Old 149]
Section 282 prescribes strict limitation boundaries beyond which no reassessment notice under Section 280 can be issued:
Normal Case: Up to 3 Years
No notice under Section 280 shall be issued if three years have elapsed from the end of the relevant assessment year, unless the case falls under the extended criteria.
Example: For AY 2024-25, 3-year deadline expires on 31st March 2028.
Extended Case: Beyond 3 Years up to 5 Years & 3 Months
Notice can be issued beyond 3 years up to 5 years and 3 months from the end of the relevant assessment year ONLY IF:
- AO has in possession books, documents, or evidence revealing that;
- Income chargeable to tax represented in the form of an asset, expenditure, or entry/entries in books;
- Which has escaped assessment amounts to or is likely to amount to ₹50 Lakhs or more for that year.
5. General Provisions & Tax Rates Applicable to Escaped Income [Section 285]
Section 285 clarifies the applicable statutory tax rates, surcharge, and cess on escaped income assessed under Section 279, ensuring that income is taxed at rates applicable to the relevant assessment year, subject to special anti-evasion rates under Section 115BBE where unexplained credits or assets are uncovered.
6. Time Limits for Completion of Assessments & Reassessments [Section 286 / Old 153]
Section 286 lays down the final statutory outer limits for completing assessment and reassessment orders. Orders passed after these deadlines are time-barred and void ab initio:
| Nature of Assessment Proceeding | Governing Statutory Section | Outer Time Limit for Passing Final Order |
|---|---|---|
| Regular Scrutiny Assessment / Best Judgment | Section 270(12) / Section 271 | 12 months from the end of the assessment year in which income was first assessable. |
| Reassessment / Recomputation | Section 279 / Section 280 | 12 months from the end of the financial year in which notice under Section 280 was served. |
| Fresh Assessment Pursuant to Set Aside Order | Pursuant to Sec 445 / 448 / 454 (Appeals / Revision) | 12 months from the end of the financial year in which order is received by PCIT/CIT. |
| Order Giving Effect to Appellate Findings | Consequential order giving effect | Within 3 months from the end of the month in which appellate/court order is received. |
In computing the period of limitation under Section 286, the following periods are excluded:
• Period during which assessment proceeding is stayed by an injunction or order of any Court.
• Period commencing from reference to Valuation Officer u/s 269 till receipt of valuation report.
• Time taken for special audit u/s 268(5) (from direction till receipt of audit report).
• Period taken in DRP proceedings under Section 275 (between draft order and receipt of directions).
12. Rectification, Notice of Demand, Loss Intimation & Search Block Assessments
1. Rectification of Mistake Apparent from the Record [Section 287 / Old 154]
Under Section 287, with a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record, any income-tax authority may amend any order passed by it, or any intimation sent under Section 270(1):
Invocation & Jurisdiction
- Suo Motu: By the authority on its own motion.
- On Application by Assessee: Upon an application made by the assessee pointing out the patent error.
- On Application by AO: Where the order was passed by the CIT(Appeals).
- Doctrine of Merger: Where an order is subject matter of appeal, the authority can rectify only matters other than those considered and decided in appeal.
Statutory Time Limits & Hearing
- 4-Year Limitation: Rectification order must be passed within 4 years from the end of the financial year in which the order sought to be amended was passed.
- Disposal in 6 Months: Authority must pass an order within 6 months from the end of the month in which application is received.
- Mandatory Hearing: If rectification increases liability or reduces refund, a reasonable opportunity of being heard is mandatory.
2. Notice of Demand [Section 289 / Old 156]
When any tax, interest, penalty, fine, or any other sum is payable in consequence of any order passed under this Act, the Assessing Officer shall serve upon the assessee a Notice of Demand in the prescribed form specifying the sum so payable.
Standard Payment Timeline
Any amount specified in the Notice of Demand must be paid within 30 days of the service of the notice at the place and to the person mentioned therein.
Shortened Period: AO may, with prior approval of Joint Commissioner, demand payment within a shorter period if there is reason to believe assessee will evade payment.
Landmark Precedent: Sri Mohan Wahi v. CIT (2001) 248 ITR 799 (SC)
The Supreme Court established that service of a valid notice of demand is a mandatory condition precedent for initiating recovery proceedings. In the absence of proof of service of notice of demand, recovery proceedings and distress warrants are illegal and premature.
3. Intimation of Loss [Section 291 / Old 157]
Where in the course of assessment of total income, the Assessing Officer computes that the assessee has sustained a loss, the AO shall notify to the assessee by an order in writing the amount of loss so computed, enabling the assessee to carry forward and set off the loss under Section 121 in subsequent years.
4. Search Block Assessment Machinery [Sections 293 to 296 / Old Chapter XIV-B]
The Income-tax Act, 2025 revives and streamlines the specialized Search Block Assessment regime for assessing undisclosed income uncovered during search and seizure operations initiated under Section 247 (Old 132) or requisitions under Section 248 (Old 132A):
| Statutory Component | Governing Section | Statutory Rules & Operative Mechanics |
|---|---|---|
| Block Period Definition | Section 293 |
The block period comprises:
• Six Assessment Years preceding the previous year in which search was conducted; AND • The broken period from 1st April of the previous year of search up to the date of execution of the last of the authorisations. |
| Computation of Undisclosed Income | Section 293 / Old 158BB |
Aggregate of total income computed based on books, evidence, money, bullion, or assets seized, as reduced by income already assessed or declared in earlier returns.
• No deductions under Chapter VIII-C (Chapter VI-A) allowable. • No set-off of brought forward losses against undisclosed income. |
| Procedure & Single Block Order | Section 294 / Old 158BC | AO serves notice requiring return of block period within 30 to 60 days. AO passes a single composite assessment order for the entire block period. |
| Flat Search Tax Rate | Section 294(5) / Section 113 | Total undisclosed income of the block period is taxed at a flat rate of 60% (plus 25% surcharge and 4% cess, resulting in an effective tax rate of 78%). |
| Time Limit for Completion | Section 296 / Old 158BE | Assessment order shall be passed within 12 months from the end of the month in which the last of the authorisations for search or requisition was executed. |
• No Updated Return: An assessee subjected to search is strictly barred from filing an updated return under Section 263(6).
• Section 275(19) Bar: Reference to Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) is strictly prohibited in block assessment proceedings.
13. ICAI Test Your Knowledge: Comprehensive Practical Solutions (Part 1)
Non-Profit Trust Assessment, Violation Reference & Limitation Extension
Facts: Teachwell Education is a registered non-profit organisation running various educational institutions. During the course of assessment under Section 270(10), the Assessing Officer finds that the trust has applied its income for purposes other than its objects. Hence, the Assessing Officer wants to pass an order without giving exemption under Schedule VIII [Table: Sl. No. 17], which the assessee objects.
Requirements: You are required to examine the following with respect to the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 2025:
(a) Whether the Assessing Officer can pass an order without giving exemption under Schedule VIII [Table: Sl. No. 17]?
(b) Can the Assessing Officer get any additional time limit to complete the assessment?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
(a) Action Permissible to Assessing Officer [Section 270(13) & Section 351(1)]
- Under Section 270(13) of the Income-tax Act, 2025, where the Assessing Officer is satisfied that a registered non-profit organisation has committed any specified violation referred to in Section 351(1), the AO cannot unilaterally withdraw or deny exemption on his own.
- Application of income for purposes other than its objects constitutes a "specified violation".
- Mandatory Reference: The AO is statutorily required to send a reference to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner recommending the withdrawal of the approval or registration of the trust.
- Outcome:
• If the PCIT/CIT passes an order cancelling or withdrawing registration: The AO shall pass an assessment order in writing rejecting the exemption under Schedule VIII.
• If the PCIT/CIT refuses to withdraw registration: The AO cannot deny exemption on that ground.
(b) Extended Limitation Period for Completing Assessment [Section 286(7)]
- Under Section 286(7), where a reference is made by the Assessing Officer to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner under Section 270(13), the normal period of limitation for completing the assessment is extended.
- Exclusion of Period: The period commencing from the date on which the AO makes the reference to the PCIT/CIT and ending on the date on which the order of withdrawal or refusal is received by the AO shall be excluded in computing the period of limitation under Section 286.
- Minimum 60-Day Guarantee: If, after excluding the aforesaid period, the remaining time available to the AO for completing the assessment is less than 60 days, the limitation period shall be extended to 60 days from the receipt of such order.
Mandatory Return Filing Triggers & Seventh Proviso Thresholds
Question: State with reasons whether return of income is required to be filed in the following cases for Tax Year 2026-27:
Case (i): Mr. X, a resident individual aged 80 years, has a total income of ₹2,85,000. He claimed deduction of ₹1,50,000 under Section 123. Long-term capital gains of ₹80,000 is not taxable by virtue of basic exemption. Assume he opted for normal provisions.
Case (ii): Would the answer in (i) change if Mr. X incurred electricity consumption expenditure of ₹1,20,000 during the year?
Case (iii): Mr. Y incurred foreign travel expenses of ₹2,20,000 for visiting the UK. His income is below taxable limits.
Case (iv): Mr. Z deposited ₹60,00,000 across savings bank accounts during the previous year.
Statutory Evaluation:
| Case # | Filing Required? | Governing Statutory Section & Reason |
|---|---|---|
| Case (i) | NO |
Under Section 263(1)(a)(iii), an individual must file a return if total income before giving effect to Chapter VIII deductions (Section 123) exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax.
Gross Total Income = ₹2,85,000 + ₹1,50,000 = ₹4,35,000. For a super senior citizen (aged 80 years), the basic exemption limit under normal provisions is ₹5,00,000. Since ₹4,35,000 ≤ ₹5,00,000, Mr. X is NOT required to file return. |
| Case (ii) | YES |
Answer Changes: Under the Seventh Proviso to Section 263(1) read with Rule 160, any person who incurs expenditure towards consumption of electricity exceeding ₹1,00,000 in aggregate during the previous year is mandatorily required to furnish a return.
Since Mr. X incurred ₹1,20,000 (> ₹1,00,000), he MUST file a return. |
| Case (iii) | YES |
Under the Seventh Proviso to Section 263(1), any person who incurs expenditure for himself or any other person for travel to a foreign country exceeding ₹2,00,000 must mandatorily file a return.
Expenditure = ₹2,20,000 (> ₹2,00,000) → Mr. Y MUST file return. |
| Case (iv) | YES |
Under Rule 160(iv) (Seventh Proviso), any person who deposits an aggregate amount of ₹50,00,000 or more in one or more savings bank accounts must file a return.
Deposits = ₹60,00,000 (≥ ₹50,00,000) → Mr. Z MUST file return. |
Notice u/s 268(1) & Forfeiture of Loss Carry-Forward
Facts: The Assessing Officer issued a notice under Section 268(1) on the assessee on 24th February 2028 calling upon him to file return of income for Tax Year 2026-27. In response to the said notice, the assessee furnished a return of loss and claimed carry forward of business loss of ₹4,50,000.
Requirement: Examine whether the assessee is entitled to carry forward the business loss.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
- Section 263(1)(a)(viii) read with Section 121 (Old Section 80): Any person who has sustained a loss under the head "Profits and gains of business or profession" or under the head "Capital gains" is entitled to carry forward such loss ONLY IF the return of loss has been furnished on or before the due date specified under Section 263(1).
- Return Furnished Pursuant to Section 268(1): A return furnished in response to a notice under Section 268(1) is NOT a return filed within the due date allowed under Section 263(1).
- Conclusion: Since the assessee furnished the loss return only after the expiry of the due date in response to notice u/s 268(1), the assessee CANNOT carry forward the business loss of ₹4,50,000.
- Carve-Out Note: Unabsorbed depreciation under Section 34(2) and house property loss are not governed by Section 121 and can be carried forward even in a belated return.
Public Trust Hospital Return Filing Mandate
Facts: A public trust hospital having aggregate annual receipts of ₹505 Lakhs has a total income of ₹2,40,000 after making application of ₹502.6 Lakhs as per the provisions of Chapter XVII-B. Is the trust required to file a return of income for Tax Year 2026-27?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
- Under Section 263(1)(a)(iii) (Old Section 139(4A)), every person in receipt of income derived from property held under trust for charitable or religious purposes must furnish a return of income if the total income without giving effect to the provisions of Chapter XVII-B (Sections 11 & 12) exceeds the maximum amount not chargeable to tax.
- In this case, total income of the trust before giving effect to application under Chapter XVII-B is ₹505 Lakhs.
- Since ₹505 Lakhs substantially exceeds the basic exemption limit (₹2,50,000 / ₹3,00,000), the public trust hospital is MANDATORILY REQUIRED to furnish its return of income on or before the statutory due date (31st October 2027).
Omission to Quote PAN in Hotel Cash Payment (Rule 159 & Sec 467)
Facts: What will be the consequences on Mr. Raghav for not quoting his PAN with respect to payment of ₹1,75,000 in cash to Shruti Hotel Ltd. for a five-day stay for business purposes?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
- Section 262(1)(f) read with Rule 159 (Old Rule 114B): Every person must quote his PAN in all documents pertaining to specified transactions.
- Prescribed Threshold: Under Rule 159, payment in cash to a hotel or restaurant against a bill or bills at any one time exceeding ₹1,00,000 is a specified transaction mandating quotation of PAN.
- Default in Given Case: Mr. Raghav made a cash payment of ₹1,75,000 (exceeding ₹1,00,000) to Shruti Hotel Ltd. without quoting his PAN.
- Penalty under Section 467(1) (Old Section 272B): For failure to comply with the provisions of Section 262, the Assessing Officer may direct that Mr. Raghav shall pay by way of penalty a sum of ₹10,000.
- Opportunity of Hearing: No penalty order under Section 467(1) shall be passed without giving Mr. Raghav a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP): Collegium, Assessees & Timelines
Question: For facilitating expeditious resolution of disputes relating to international transactions involving transfer pricing and foreign companies, the Income-tax Act, 2025 provides for an "alternate dispute resolution mechanism". In this context, answer the following:
(i) Meaning of Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) and eligible assessee;
(ii) Timelines for filing objections and issuance of directions;
(iii) Applicability of DRP provisions to search block assessments.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
(i) DRP Definition & Eligible Assessees [Section 275(1)]
- DRP Collegium: A collegium comprising three Principal Commissioners or Commissioners of Income-tax constituted by the CBDT.
- Eligible Assessee:
• (a) Any non-resident not being a company, or any foreign company;
• (b) Any person in whose case variation arises as a consequence of transfer pricing adjustment under Section 181 (Old 92CA).
(ii) Procedural Timelines [Section 275(2)-(5)]
- Objections by Assessee: Within 30 days of receipt of the draft assessment order from the AO.
- Directions by DRP: Within 9 months from the end of the month in which draft order was forwarded to assessee.
- Final Order by AO: Within 30 days from end of month of receiving DRP directions.
- Binding Force: Directions are strictly binding on the AO.
As per Section 275(19), the provisions of Section 275 shall NOT apply to any proceedings relating to block assessment under Section 294 / 295. An assessee undergoing search block assessment cannot approach the DRP.
Best Judgment Assessment: Triggers, Principles & Remedies
Question: The Assessing Officer has the power to make an assessment to the best of his judgment in certain situations. What are they? Explain the guiding judicial principles.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
Under Section 271 (Old Section 144), the Assessing Officer is obligated to make an assessment to the best of his judgment upon any of the following four defaults:
- Failure to furnish a return under Section 263(1) and no belated return u/s 263(4) or revised return u/s 263(5) is filed.
- Failure to comply with all the terms of a notice issued under Section 268(1) (to file return, produce accounts, documents, or statements).
- Failure to comply with a direction issued under Section 268(5) to get accounts audited by a Chartered Accountant.
- Failure to comply with all terms of a notice issued under Section 270(8) (scrutiny notice).
• State of Kerala v. C. Velukutty (1966) 60 ITR 239 (SC): The assessment must not be dishonest, vindictive, or capricious. It must be an honest and fair estimate arrived at after considering all relevant material gathered by the AO.
• Notice to Show Cause: Mandatory unless notice u/s 268(1) has already been served.
• Remedies: The assessee can appeal to CIT(Appeals) or file a revision petition under Section 456 (Old 264).
Search Block Assessment & Updated Return Disqualification
Facts: Mr. Sanskar is engaged in retail trade and declared income of ₹10 Lakhs to ₹15 Lakhs every year for the last 10 years. A search was conducted under Section 247 on his business premises on 5th July 2026. The search concluded by executing the last authorisation on 10th August 2026. The AO intends to assess him under block assessment provisions. Can he do so? Can Mr. Sanskar file an updated return?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
1. Applicability of Block Assessment [Chapter XVI-B / Sec 293-296]
- Since search was initiated under Section 247 on 05.07.2026 and concluded on 10.08.2026, the Search Block Assessment provisions contained in Chapter XVI-B apply.
- Block Period: 6 Assessment Years preceding the year of search (i.e., AY 2021-22 to AY 2026-27) PLUS the period from 01.04.2026 to 10.08.2026.
- Flat Tax Rate: Undisclosed income is taxed at a flat rate of 60% (+ 25% surcharge and 4% cess, effective 78%).
- Conclusion: The AO is fully justified and empowered to proceed under block assessment.
2. Bar on Filing Updated Return [Section 263(6)]
- Under the First Proviso to Section 263(6), an assessee is strictly disqualified from furnishing an updated return if a search has been initiated under Section 247 (Old 132).
- This bar applies to the tax year in which the search is conducted AND any preceding tax year included in the block period.
- Conclusion: Mr. Sanskar CANNOT furnish an updated return for any of the assessment years falling within the block period.
14. ICAI Test Your Knowledge: Comprehensive Practical Solutions (Part 2)
Scope of Prima Facie Adjustments in Summary Processing u/s 270(1)
Question: Examine whether the Assessing Officer has the power to make any adjustment to the income disclosed by the assessee in the return of income in the course of processing the return under Section 270(1)? Explain the statutory safeguards.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
Under Section 270(1) (Old Section 143(1)), the total income or loss declared by the assessee can be adjusted only by making the following specified prima facie adjustments:
- Arithmetical Errors: Any arithmetical error apparent in the return.
- Incorrect Claims: An incorrect claim apparent from any information in the return (e.g., inconsistent entries, missing mandatory audit reports, or claims exceeding statutory limits).
- Disallowance of Untimely Losses: Disallowance of carry forward of loss under business or capital gains if the return is furnished beyond the due date specified under Section 263(1).
- Audit Report Disallowances: Disallowance of expenditure or increase in income indicated in the tax audit report (Form 3CD) but omitted to be taken into account in computing total income in the return.
- Disallowance of Chapter VI-A / SEZ Deductions: Disallowance of deduction claimed under Sections 127/128/131/132/133 (Old 10AA, 80-IA, 80-IAB, 80-IB, 80-IC, 80-ID, 80-IE) if the return is furnished after the statutory due date.
No adjustment shall be made without first giving an intimation to the assessee of such adjustment either in writing or electronically. The assessee must be allowed a response period of 30 days from the date of issue of such notice. If no response is received within 30 days, the proposed adjustment shall be made.
Delayed Scrutiny Notice & Section 292BB Curability
Facts: Tai Ltd. filed its return of income for Tax Year 2026-27 on 26th September 2027. The return is selected for regular assessment under Section 270(10), for which a notice under Section 270(8) is served on the company on 3rd July 2028. The company responded to the notice under Section 270(8).
Requirements:
(a) Examine whether the service of notice is within time.
(b) Can the company challenge the validity of the assessment on the ground of delayed service?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
(a) Limitation Period under Section 270(9)
- Under Section 270(9) (Old Section 143(2)), no notice under Section 270(8) can be served on the assessee after the expiry of 3 months from the end of the financial year in which the return is furnished.
- Return furnished on 26.09.2027 → Filed in FY 2027-28.
- End of FY 2027-28 is 31st March 2028.
- Three months expire on 30th June 2028.
- Outcome: Notice was served on 3rd July 2028 (after 30th June 2028). Hence, the notice was NOT served within the statutory time limit.
(b) Curability under Section 292BB & Challenge Validity
- Section 292BB Deeming Fiction: Deems notice to be validly served if the assessee appeared in the proceedings, UNLESS the assessee has raised an objection before the completion of assessment.
- Right to Challenge:
• If Tai Ltd. raises an objection regarding delayed service before the completion of assessment, the deeming fiction of Section 292BB will NOT apply.
• The assessment completed pursuant to a time-barred notice will be invalid and void ab initio (ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon (2010) 321 ITR 362 (SC)).
• However, if Tai Ltd. participates without raising an objection before completion, it will be precluded from challenging it in appeal.
Fresh Claims Before AO Restricted to Revised Return
Proposition: “A fresh claim before the Assessing Officer can be made only by filing a revised return and not otherwise”.
Discuss the correctness or otherwise of this proposition in the context of the Income-tax Act, 2025.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
The proposition is correct, subject to the option to furnish an updated return under Section 263(6) (where additional tax is payable).
- Section 263(5) Mechanism: Where an assessee discovers any omission or wrong statement in the return filed u/s 263(1) or 263(4), he may furnish a revised return at any time on or before 31st December of the Assessment Year or before the completion of assessment, whichever is earlier.
- Supreme Court Doctrine in Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT (2006) 284 ITR 323: The Supreme Court held that the Assessing Officer has no inherent power to entertain a claim for deduction made after the filing of the return otherwise than by way of a revised return.
- Appellate Carve-Out: The Supreme Court specifically clarified that this restriction applies strictly to the Assessing Officer. It does not bar appellate authorities (CIT(Appeals) or ITAT) from admitting a genuine deduction claim omitted in the return.
Direction for Special Audit Without Hearing (Sahara India Doctrine)
Facts: The Assessing Officer, within the powers vested in him under Section 268(5), while examining the accounts of PNF Ltd., ordered the company to get its accounts audited by a special auditor. The company challenges this order on the ground “that an opportunity of being heard was not provided to them by the Assessing Officer before passing the order”.
Requirement: Examine whether the challenge by the company is valid.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
The direction for special audit issued without providing an opportunity of being heard is illegal, ultra vires, and void ab initio.
- Proviso to Section 268(5) (Old Section 142(2A)): The statute explicitly provides that the Assessing Officer shall NOT direct the assessee to get the accounts so audited unless the assessee has been given a reasonable opportunity of being heard.
- Supreme Court Ruling in Sahara India (Firm) v. CIT (2008) 300 ITR 403: The Supreme Court held that a direction for special audit entails civil consequences and causes substantial inconvenience and expenditure to the assessee. Therefore, the requirement of giving a pre-decisional hearing is an indispensable facet of the principles of natural justice.
- Final Verdict: The order passed by the AO directing special audit without granting a hearing is bad in law and liable to be quashed.
Composite Agricultural Income & Return Filing Threshold (CBDT Circular 10/2006)
Facts: Smt. Kanti, aged 49 years, is engaged in the business of growing, curing, roasting, and grounding of coffee in India after mixing chicory. She had an income of ₹6,00,000 from this business, which was her only source of income during the year ended on 31.03.2027. She consults you to have an opinion on whether she is required to file a return of income for Tax Year 2026-27.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
1. Apportionment of Composite Income (Rule 8)
- Under Rule 8 of the Income-tax Rules, composite income derived from growing, curing, roasting, and grounding of coffee with or without mixing chicory is apportioned as:
• 60% is treated as Agricultural Income (Exempt under Section 10(1) / Section 8).
• 40% is treated as Business Income chargeable to tax under PGBP. - Business Income = 40% × ₹6,00,000 = ₹2,40,000.
2. CBDT Circular No. 10/2006 & Filing Mandate
- CBDT Circular No. 10/2006 (dated 16.10.2006): Clarified that where an individual derives composite income from coffee, the requirement to file a return of income under Section 263(1) is determined by comparing the taxable business portion (40%) with the basic exemption limit.
- Taxable business portion is ₹2,40,000, which is less than the basic exemption limit of ₹2,50,000 (normal regime) / ₹3,00,000 (concessional regime).
- Conclusion: Smt. Kanti is NOT required to file a return of income for Tax Year 2026-27.
Fresh Deduction Claim in Scrutiny via Letter (Goetze India Application)
Facts: Ram, an individual, filed his return of income for Tax Year 2026-27 on 15.06.2027. He later discovered that he had not claimed deduction under Section 123 (Old 80C) in the said return though he had opted for normal provisions. He claimed the deduction during scrutiny assessment by addressing a letter to the AO. The AO completed the assessment without allowing the deduction. Ram consults you whether the AO's action is valid, and what remedies are available.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
1. Validity of Assessing Officer's Action
- Goetze (India) Ltd. v. CIT (2006) 284 ITR 323 (SC): The Supreme Court unequivocally held that the Assessing Officer has no jurisdiction to entertain a claim for deduction made after filing of the return otherwise than by way of a revised return under Section 263(5).
- Since Ram claimed the deduction only by way of a written letter during assessment without submitting a formal revised return, the Assessing Officer was fully justified in completing the assessment without allowing the claim.
2. Legal Remedies Available to Ram
- Appeal Before CIT(Appeals): The Supreme Court expressly clarified that the restriction in Goetze India is confined only to the Assessing Officer and does not limit the appellate powers of the CIT(Appeals). Ram can file an appeal under Section 445 before the CIT(A), who has the statutory authority to entertain the bona fide deduction.
- Updated Return: Alternatively, Ram could explore filing an updated return under Section 263(6) only if there is a net increase in tax liability.
Duty of AO to Allow Mandatory Set-Off of Losses (Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills)
Proposition: “The Assessing Officer is bound to allow the set-off of brought forward losses even if not claimed in the return of income”.
Examine the correctness or otherwise of this statement in the context of the Income-tax Act, 2025 and decided case law.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
The Assessing Officer is duty-bound under the statute to allow set-off of brought forward losses determined in earlier assessments, even if inadvertently omitted in the return.
- Supreme Court Ruling in CIT v. Mahalakshmi Sugar Mills Co. Ltd. (1986) 160 ITR 920: The Supreme Court held that it is the statutory duty of the Assessing Officer to apply the mandatory provisions of the Act for the purpose of determining the correct total income and tax liability of the assessee.
- Mandatory Provisions: The provisions relating to set-off of brought forward losses under Section 121 (Old Section 72) are mandatory in nature. Once a loss has been validly determined and computed in an earlier assessment year and is available for carry forward, the AO must allow the set-off against current year business profits.
- Distinction from Goetze India: Goetze India applies to optional or discretionary deductions (like Chapter VIII deductions) requiring verification of investments. It does not apply to mandatory statutory set-off of losses already determined on official record.
Ineligibility for Tax Return Preparer (TRP) in Tax Audit Cases
Facts: Mr. X, an individual, has got his books of account for the year ending 31.03.2027 audited under Section 63 (Old Section 44AB). His total income for Tax Year 2026-27 is ₹5,20,000. He desires to know if he can furnish his return of income for Tax Year 2026-27 through a Tax Return Preparer (TRP).
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
Assessees liable to mandatory tax audit under Section 63 are strictly excluded from the TRP Scheme.
- Section 264(1) (Old Section 139B): Provides for the submission of returns through Tax Return Preparers by specified classes of persons.
- Statutory Exclusions under TRP Scheme: Under the Tax Return Preparer Scheme framed by the CBDT, the following categories of persons are expressly barred from filing returns through a TRP:
• Any company;
• Any person whose accounts are required to be audited under Section 63 (tax audit) or under any other law;
• Any non-resident. - Application to Case: Although Mr. X is an individual, his accounts were audited under Section 63 for the tax year. Consequently, he is disqualified from utilizing the services of a Tax Return Preparer to file his return.