Chapter 18: Miscellaneous Provisions & Cash Restrictions
Comprehensive study notes covering statutory cash transaction prohibitions (Sections 185 to 188), fraudulent transfers & provisional attachment (Sections 499 & 500), service and technical regularity of notices (Sections 501 to 523), Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) and AIS reporting (Sections 507 to 510), authorised representation (Section 515), CBDT rule-making powers, schemes, removal of difficulties, and repeal & savings (Sections 533 to 536) under the Income-tax Act, 2025 and Finance Act, 2026.
Chapter 18 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 compiles the vital administrative, enforcement, reporting, and transitory provisions that underpin the direct tax framework in India. It bridges substantive tax charging provisions with procedural integrity, safeguarding public revenue against tax avoidance, unrecorded cash circulation, fraudulent alienations, and procedural invalidations.
Statutory Concordance: 1961 Act vs. Income-tax Act, 2025
The Income-tax Act, 2025 renumbers and logically regroups the miscellaneous and cash restriction provisions previously scattered across Chapters XX-B, XXI, and XXIII of the Income-tax Act, 1961:
| Subject Matter | 1961 Act | 2025 Act | Substantive Rule / Key Threshold | Consequential Penalty / Sanction |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acceptance of Loans, Deposits & Specified Sums | Sec 269SS | Sec 185 | No cash acceptance if aggregate ≥ ₹20,000 (PACS: ₹2,00,000) | Sec 450 / 471 (100% of amount taken) |
| Mode of Undertaking Transactions (Cash Receipts) | Sec 269ST | Sec 186 | No cash receipt ≥ ₹2,00,000 in a day / single txn / event | Sec 473 (100% of sum received) |
| Facility for Prescribed Electronic Modes | Sec 269SU | Sec 187 | Mandatory for business turnover > ₹50 Crores (Rule 133) | Sec 452 / 474 (₹5,000 per day of default) |
| Repayment of Certain Loans or Deposits | Sec 269T | Sec 188 | No cash repayment if aggregate with interest ≥ ₹20,000 | Sec 453 / 475 (100% of amount repaid) |
| Transfers to Defraud Revenue to be Deemed Void | Sec 281 | Sec 499 | Transfers during pending proceedings void against tax claims | Inoperable transfer; civil suit u/s 53 TPA |
| Provisional Attachment of Property | Sec 281B | Sec 500 | Attachment to protect revenue during pending assessment/penalty | Valid 6 months; extendable up to 2 years |
| Service of Notice Generally | Sec 282 | Sec 501 | Post, approved courier, CPC summons, electronic record (Rule 127) | Valid statutory service of notices |
| Authentication of Notices & Documents | Sec 282A | Sec 502 | Signed in paper or electronic form; mandatory DIN (Rule 233) | Unauthenticated notice void ab initio |
| Notice to Disrupted HUF or Dissolved Firm | Sec 283 | Sec 503 | Served on last Manager / all adult members; or erstwhile partners | Valid service binding on successors |
| Notice in case of Discontinued Business | Sec 284 | Sec 504 | Served on person assessed, member of erstwhile AOP/firm, or PO | Procedural continuation of recovery |
| Statement by Film Producers & Event Managers | Sec 285B | Sec 507 | Form 164 within 60 days of FY end for payments > ₹50,000 | General penal provisions for non-filing |
| Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) | Sec 285BA | Sec 508 | Form 165 due 31st May; reporting 12 transaction types (Rule 237) | Fee: ₹200/day (Sec 427); Pen: ₹1000/day (Sec 454) |
| Information on Crypto-Asset Transactions | Sec 285BAA | Sec 509 | Reporting by crypto exchanges/wallets by 31st May (Rule 243) | Sec 446 (₹200/day & ₹50,000 for inaccuracy) |
| Annual Information Statement (AIS / TIS) | Sec 285BB | Sec 510 | Upload in e-filing account within 90 days in Form 168 (Rule 245) | Statutory pre-filling & taxpayer verification |
| Publication of Names of Defaulters | Sec 287 | Sec 512 | Public interest gazette/media publication after appeal disposal | Naming & shaming tax defaulters |
| Appearance by Registered Valuers & Registration | Sec 287A | Sec 513-514 | Valuation of assets by registered valuers (Rules 246 & 247) | Disqualification for bias/interest |
| Appearance by Authorised Representative (AR) | Sec 288 | Sec 515 | CA, advocate, employee, relative; disqualification code | Misconduct debarment; 1 mo appeal to CBDT |
| Rounding Off of Income, Tax & Refund; Receipts | Sec 288A/B | Sec 516-517 | Total income and tax rounded off to nearest multiple of ₹10 | Statutory receipt given for all recoveries |
| Indemnity of Persons Deducting / Paying Tax | Sec 290 | Sec 518 | Persons paying tax for others fully indemnified by statute | Protection against third-party civil liability |
| Return / Notice Not to Become Invalid (Technical Defects) | Sec 292B | Sec 522 | Mistake/defect curable if in substance & effect in conformity | Validates clerical/typographical errors & DIN |
| Notice Deemed Valid on Participation | Sec 292BB | Sec 523 | Deemed served if assessee appeared without prior written objection | Precludes non-service defense (infirmities only) |
| Bar of Suits in Civil Courts | Sec 293 | Sec 526 | No civil court can set aside/modify any income-tax order | Exclusive tribunal & writ jurisdiction |
| Condonation of Delays & Withdrawal of Approvals | Sec 293B/C | Sec 528-529 | CBDT/Govt power to condone delay; inherent power to revoke | Principles of natural justice mandatory |
| Charge of Tax Pending Finance Act Passage | Sec 294 | Sec 530 | Provisional rate applies from April 1 (more favourable to assessee) | Continuous statutory charge without lapse |
| Powers to Frame Schemes (Faceless / Digital) | Sec 293D | Sec 532 | Faceless schemes to eliminate physical interface & optimize | Parliamentary laying requirement (Sec 532(4)) |
| CBDT Rule-Making Power & Parliamentary Laying | Sec 295-296 | Sec 533-534 | CBDT empowers IT Rules 2026; 30-day laying in both Houses | Retrospective rules cannot prejudicially affect |
| Power to Remove Difficulties | Sec 298 | Sec 535 | Removal of transitional difficulties within 3-year sunset period | Must be laid before Parliament |
| Repeal and Savings (Transition from 1961 Act) | Sec 297 | Sec 536 | Repeal of 1961 Act; extensive savings of actions, losses & credits | General Clauses Act Sec 6 applied |
To curb the circulation of black money, suppress tax evasion, and promote a digital financial architecture, Sections 185 to 188 impose stringent statutory prohibitions on taking, receiving, and repaying loans, deposits, and specified advance sums in cash, backed by equivalent 100% monetary penalties.
Section 185: Prohibition on Accepting Loans, Deposits and Specified Sums in Cash (Old Sec 269SS)
Section 185 mandates that no person shall take or accept from another person any loan or deposit or specified sum, otherwise than by an:
- (a) Account payee cheque; or
- (b) Account payee bank draft; or
- (c) Electronic clearing system (ECS) through a bank account; or
- (d) Any other prescribed electronic mode (Rule 133 / Tier-III CBDC).
The prohibition triggers if, on the date of taking or accepting such loan, deposit, or specified sum:
- The amount or aggregate amount of such loan, deposit, or specified sum is ₹20,000 or more; or
- The amount or aggregate amount of any previously taken/accepted loan, deposit, or specified sum by such person from such other person, which remains unpaid (whether due for repayment or not) on that date, is ₹20,000 or more; or
- The aggregate of the fresh amount (1) and previous unpaid amount (2) is ₹20,000 or more.
A higher threshold of ₹2,00,000 is applicable where:
- Such deposit is accepted by a Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS) or a Primary Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development Bank (PCARDB) from its member; or
- A loan is taken from a PACS or PCARDB by its member.
Statutory Exceptions from Section 185
The prohibition under Section 185 does NOT apply to:
- Government & Regulated Entities: Loan, deposit, or specified sum taken or accepted from or by:
- The Central Government or any State Government;
- Any banking company, post office savings bank, or co-operative bank;
- Any corporation established by a Central, State, or Provincial Act;
- Any Government company as defined in Section 2(45) of the Companies Act, 2013;
- Any institution, association, or body notified by the Central Government.
- Pure Agriculturists Exemption: Where the person taking or accepting such loan, deposit, or specified sum and the person from whom such loan, deposit, or specified sum is taken or accepted, both have only agricultural income and neither of them has any income chargeable to tax under the Act.
| Key Statutory Term | Statutory Definition & Scope |
|---|---|
| Loan or Deposit | Any loan or deposit of money. |
| Specified Sum | Any sum of money receivable, whether as advance or otherwise, in relation to transfer of an immovable property, whether or not the transfer takes place. |
| Prescribed Electronic Modes | (a) Credit Card; (b) Debit Card; (c) Net Banking; (d) IMPS; (e) UPI; (f) RTGS; (g) NEFT; (h) BHIM Aadhaar Pay; (i) Tier-III: Full KYC Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) wallets, P-CBDC, Wholesale/Crossborder CBDC. |
If a person takes or accepts any loan, deposit, or specified sum in contravention of Section 185, the Assessing Officer / Joint Commissioner may impose a penalty of a sum equal to the amount of the loan, deposit, or specified sum so taken or accepted (100% penalty).
Mitigation: Under Section 470 (Old 273B), no penalty shall be imposable if the assessee proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure.
Section 186: Mode of Undertaking Transactions & Prescribed Banking Mode (Old Sec 269ST)
Section 186 enacts an overarching cash receipt ceiling of ₹2,00,000. It provides that no person shall receive an amount of ₹2,00,000 or more:
Receipt of such sums must be made solely through account payee cheque, account payee bank draft, electronic clearing system through a bank account, or other prescribed electronic modes.
Statutory Exceptions under Section 186
The prohibition under Section 186 does not apply to:
- (1) Any receipt by Government, banking company, post office savings bank, or co-operative bank;
- (2) Transactions of the nature referred to in Section 185 (loans/deposits/specified immovable property sums);
- (3) Receipts by business correspondents on behalf of banks per RBI guidelines (Notification No. 28/2017);
- (4) Receipts by White Label ATM Operators from retail outlets on behalf of banks (Notification No. 28/2017);
- (5) Cash withdrawals by any person from a bank, co-operative bank, or post office savings bank (Notification No. 28/2017);
- (6) Receipts from agents by issuers of prepaid payment instruments under RBI authorisation;
- (7) Receipts by credit card companies against bills raised in respect of credit cards;
- (8) Receipts which are exempt from total income under Section 10 (Notification No. 57/2017).
Crucial CBDT Clarifications on Section 186
In respect of receipts by NBFCs or Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) as loan repayments, the receipt of one instalment of loan repayment constitutes a ‘single transaction’ under clause (b) of Section 186. All instalments paid over the tenure of a loan shall NOT be aggregated together. Thus, cash repayment of an EMI below ₹2 lakh is valid even if total loan repaid over time exceeds ₹2 lakh.
In respect of Co-operative Societies, a dealership or distributorship contract by itself does not constitute an "event or occasion" under clause (c). Receipts related to such contracts on any day within the prescribed limit complying with clauses (a) and (b) may not be aggregated across multiple days for that previous year.
Rule 26 exempts cash purchases of agricultural produce from disallowance u/s 36(4) / 40A(3) in the hands of the trader.
However, Section 186 prohibits receipt of ₹2,00,000 or more in cash.
Harmonious Resolution: Where a cultivator sells agricultural produce to a trader in cash for an amount less than ₹2,00,000:
- (a) No disallowance u/s 36(4) in the hands of the trader;
- (b) No violation u/s 186 in the hands of the cultivator; and
- (c) No requirement for the cultivator to quote PAN or furnish Form 97 (Rule 159).
The Joint Commissioner may impose on the recipient a penalty of a sum equal to the amount of such receipt (100% penalty). Section 470 provides relief if reasonable cause is established.
Section 187: Mandatory Acceptance of Payments Through Prescribed Electronic Modes (Old Sec 269SU)
Section 187 mandates that every person carrying on business or profession whose total sales, turnover, or gross receipts in such business/profession exceeds ₹50 Crores during the immediately preceding tax year shall provide a facility for accepting payment through prescribed electronic modes, in addition to any other electronic facilities offered.
Prescribed Electronic Modes under Rule 133
The CBDT clarified that the provisions of Section 187 shall NOT apply to a specified person having only B2B transactions (i.e. no transactions with retail customers/consumers) if at least 95% of aggregate of all amounts received during the previous year (including sales turnover and gross receipts) are received by any mode other than cash.
The Joint Commissioner may impose on a person failing to provide such prescribed electronic payment facility a penalty of ₹5,000 for every day during which the default continues. Section 470 reasonable cause defense applies.
Section 188: Mode of Repayment of Loans, Deposits & Specified Advances (Old Sec 269T)
Section 188 provides that no branch of a banking company or a co-operative bank, company, co-operative society, firm, or other person shall repay any loan or deposit made with it or any specified advance received by it, otherwise than through an:
- (a) Account payee cheque;
- (b) Account payee bank draft drawn in the name of the payee; or
- (c) Electronic clearing system (ECS) through a bank account or prescribed electronic modes.
Applicable if, on the date of repayment:
- The amount of loan, deposit, or specified advance together with interest is ₹20,000 or more; or
- The aggregate amount of loans or deposits held by such person (either in his own name or jointly with any other person) on that date together with interest is ₹20,000 or more; or
- The aggregate amount of specified advances received by such person (either in his own name or jointly with any other person) on that date together with interest is ₹20,000 or more.
A higher limit of ₹2,00,000 applies where such deposit is repaid to a member by a PACS / PCARDB, or such loan is repaid by a member to a PACS / PCARDB.
Statutory Exceptions under Section 188
- Direct Bank Account Credit: Where repayment is made by a banking company or co-operative bank by directly crediting the loan/deposit amount to the savings or current account of the depositor with such branch.
- Government & Institutional Payees: Repayment of loan, deposit, or specified advance taken from Government, banks, post office savings banks, statutory corporations, or Government companies.
The Joint Commissioner may impose a penalty equal to the amount of the loan, deposit, or specified advance so repaid (100% penalty). Section 470 reasonable cause defense applies.
However, where the cross-transactions were genuine, transparent, entered into in the ordinary course of business to avoid unnecessary circular movements of funds, and not intended to evade tax, it constitutes ‘reasonable cause’ under Section 470 (Old 273B). Therefore, no penalty can be imposed on the assessee!
To prevent tax defaulters from defeating tax recovery through collusive alienations or dissipating assets during pending assessments, Sections 499 and 500 provide powerful statutory armor to the Income-tax Department.
Section 499: Certain Transfers to Defraud Revenue to be Deemed Void (Old Sec 281)
Section 499 acts as an statutory safeguard against non-realisation of tax revenue caused by fraudulent transferring of assets by a defaulting assessee.
- Timing of Transfer: During the pendency of any proceeding under the Income-tax Act, 2025, or after completion thereof but before service of notice by the Tax Recovery Officer (TRO) as per Section 413;
- Nature of Transfer: Assessee creates a charge on, or parts with the property by way of sale, mortgage, gift, exchange, or any other mode of transfer of any of his assets in favour of any person;
- Legal Effect: Such charge or transfer must be deemed to be void as against any claim in respect of any tax or other sum payable by the assessee as a result of completion of proceedings or otherwise.
De Minimis Monetary Thresholds
The provisions of Section 499 apply only to cases where:
- (a) The amount of tax or other sum of money payable or likely to be payable exceeds ₹5,000; and
- (b) The assets which are charged or transferred by the assessee exceed ₹10,000 in value.
Statutory Safe Harbours (When Transfer is NOT Void)
A transfer or charge made by the assessee shall NOT be void if it is made:
The term ‘assets’ covers land, buildings, machinery, plant, shares, securities, fixed deposits in banks, and Virtual Digital Assets (VDAs), to the extent to which any of these do not form part of the stock-in-trade of the business of the assessee.
To declare a transfer fraudulent and void against the department, the Assessing Officer must institute a civil suit for a declaration in a competent Civil Court under Section 53 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The AO cannot unilaterally pass an administrative order declaring the sale deed void!
Section 500: Provisional Attachment to Protect the Interests of the Revenue (Old Sec 281B)
Section 500 empowers the Assessing Officer to provisionally attach any property belonging to the assessee during the pendency of assessment or penalty proceedings, subject to strict procedural checks.
| Parameter | Statutory Requirement under Section 500 |
|---|---|
| Jurisdictional Triggers |
Pendency of:
• Assessment or reassessment of any income which has escaped assessment; or • Penalty proceedings under Section 444 (false entry / omission in books of account) where penalty likely to be imposed exceeds ₹2 Crores. |
| Supervisory Approval | Mandatory previous approval of the Competent Authority: Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner / Commissioner / Principal Director General / Director General / Director. |
| Initial Validity | 6 Months from the date of the provisional attachment order. |
| Extension of Period | Competent Authority may extend for reasons in writing. Total period of extension shall not exceed 2 years or 60 days after the date of assessment/reassessment order, whichever is later. |
| Revocation on Bank Guarantee [Sec 500(4)-(5)] | AO shall revoke attachment if assessee furnishes an irrevocable scheduled bank guarantee for an amount not less than the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the property (or lower if AO is satisfied revenue is protected). |
| Valuation Officer Reference [Sec 500(6)] | AO may refer FMV determination to Valuation Officer u/s 269(3)-(7). Valuation Officer must submit report within 30 days. |
| Time Limits for Revocation Order [Sec 500(7)] |
• Where reference made to Valuation Officer: within 45 days from receipt of bank guarantee;
• In any other case: within 15 days from receipt of bank guarantee. |
| Invocation of Guarantee [Sec 500(8)-(10)] |
• On failure to satisfy notice of demand within time specified; or
• Failure to renew guarantee before 15 days of its expiry. Realised funds adjusted against tax demand; surplus kept in Personal Deposit Account of PCIT/CIT with RBI/SBI. |
Because the membership card is not the alienable property of the assessee, it CANNOT be attached under Section 500!
Procedural regularity in issuing, authenticating, and serving statutory notices is the bedrock of valid tax proceedings. Sections 501 to 523 establish modern digital delivery rules while guarding against frivolous invalidations.
Section 501: Permissible Modes of Service of Notice (Old Sec 282)
Section 501 provides that service of any notice, summons, requisition, order, or communication under the Act may be effected by delivering or transmitting a copy thereof to the person named therein:
Section 502: Authentication of Notices & Mandatory DIN (Old Sec 282A)
Section 502 read with Rule 233 mandates that any notice, summons, or document issued by an income-tax authority must be signed and issued in paper form or communicated in electronic form in accordance with prescribed procedure.
Every notice, order, or statutory communication issued by any tax authority must bear a computer-generated Document Identification Number (DIN). Under CBDT Circular 19/2019, any communication issued without a DIN is non-est and invalid ab initio.
In electronic communications, authentication is established if the name and office of the designated income-tax authority is printed/stamped thereon and authenticated via Digital Signature (DSC) or Electronic Verification Code (EVC).
Sections 503 & 504: Service of Notice on Disrupted HUF, Dissolved Firms & Discontinued Business
| Status of Assessee | Section | Persons upon Whom Notice Must Be Addressed & Served |
|---|---|---|
| Partitioned Hindu Undivided Family (HUF) | Sec 503 |
• On the person who was the last Manager (Karta) of the HUF; or
• If he is dead, then on all adult members who were members of the HUF immediately before the partition. |
| Dissolved Partnership Firm / AOP | Sec 503 | On any person who was a partner (not being a minor) or member of the association immediately before its dissolution. |
| Discontinued Business / Profession | Sec 504 |
• Person whose income is to be assessed; or
• Member of firm/AOP at the time of discontinuance; or • Principal Officer in the case of a company. |
Section 522: Technical Defects Not to Invalidate Returns, Notices & Assessments (Old Sec 292B)
Section 522 provides that no return of income, assessment order, notice, summons, or other proceeding shall be invalid or deemed invalid merely by reason of any mistake, defect, or omission, if such return, order, notice, or proceeding is in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the intent and purpose of this Act.
- Typographical / Clerical Mistakes: An assessment order mentioning Tax Year 2026-27 instead of 2027-28 in one place, while the entire substance pertains to T.Y. 2027-28, remains completely valid.
- DIN Typographical Errors: No assessment shall be invalid for mistake, defect, or omission in quoting computer-generated DIN, if the order is referenced by such number in any manner.
- Supervisory Approvals: Under Section 522(3), electronic approvals by superior authorities are administrative/supervisory and cannot be challenged on grounds of insufficiency of reasons or absence of digital signature.
Section 523: Notice Deemed Valid where Assessee Participated in Proceedings (Old Sec 292BB)
Section 523 creates a statutory estoppel. Where an assessee has appeared in any proceeding or co-operated in any inquiry relating to assessment or reassessment, it shall be deemed that any statutory notice required to be served was duly served in time in accordance with the Act.
The assessee is precluded from raising any objection at an appellate stage that the notice was:
(a) Not served upon him; or
(b) Not served upon him in time; or
(c) Served upon him in an improper manner.
VITAL PROVISO: This deeming fiction does NOT apply if the assessee raised an objection in writing BEFORE the completion of such assessment or reassessment!
Section 523 DOES NOT cure complete absence or failure to issue the statutory notice. Notice u/s 270(8) is foundational to assumption of jurisdiction; its total non-issuance renders the assessment void ab initio, despite taxpayer participation!
Initiating assessment proceedings against a dead/non-existent entity is a substantive jurisdictional illegality, not a procedural irregularity. Participation by the amalgamated entity cannot cure this fundamental defect under Section 523!
Modern income-tax administration relies extensively on automated, third-party, and institutional reporting. Sections 507 to 510 establish robust frameworks for gathering financial intelligence, eliminating information asymmetry, and powering seamless pre-filling of returns.
Section 507: Statements by Film Producers & Persons in Specified Activities (Old Sec 285B)
Section 507 read with Rule 236 requires every producer of a cinematograph film or person engaged in any specified activity (or both) during the whole or any part of any tax year to furnish a statement in Form No. 164.
| Parameter | Statutory Rule & Procedure |
|---|---|
| Prescribed Form | Form No. 164 (Rule 236) |
| Due Date for Filing | Within 60 days from the end of the tax year (or within 60 days of completion of production/activity). |
| Filing Mode & Authority | Electronically to the Director General of Income-tax (Systems) or authorised officer, who forwards it to the jurisdictional Assessing Officer. |
| Reporting Threshold | Particulars of all payments exceeding ₹50,000 in the aggregate made by him or due from him to each person engaged in such production or activity. |
| Scope of ‘Specified Activity’ |
(i) Event management; (ii) Documentary production; (iii) Production of programmes for television, OTT, or similar streaming platforms; (iv) Sports event management; (v) Other performing arts or any activity notified by the Central Government. |
Section 508: Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) or Reportable Account (Old Sec 285BA)
Section 508 imposes a mandatory obligation on designated reporting entities to register, maintain records, and furnish a Statement of Financial Transaction (SFT) or Reportable Account in Form No. 165 on or before 31st May following the relevant financial year.
Statutory Compliance Lifecycle under Section 508
Comprehensive SFT Reporting Matrix [Rule 237 Table]
| Sl. | Nature of Financial Transaction | Reporting Threshold Value | Reporting Person / Entity Responsible |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1(a) | Payment in cash for purchase of bank drafts, pay orders, or banker's cheques | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more (with PAN) / ₹5 Lakh or more (without PAN) in a FY | Banking company or co-operative bank |
| 1(b) | Payment in cash or otherwise for purchase of prepaid instruments (PPI) issued under RBI PSS Act | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more in a FY | Banking company or co-operative bank |
| 1(c) | Cash deposits or cash withdrawals (including bearer's cheque) in/from one or more Current Accounts | Aggregating to ₹50 Lakh or more in a FY | Banking company or co-operative bank |
| 2 | Cash deposits in one or more accounts (other than Current & Time Deposits, e.g. Savings Accounts) | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more (with PAN) / ₹5 Lakh or more (without PAN) in a FY | Banking company, co-op bank, or Post Master General |
| 3 | One or more Time Deposits (other than renewal of another time deposit) | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more in a FY | Bank, co-op bank, Post Master General, Nidhi, or deposit-taking NBFC |
| 4 | Payments made by any person against Credit Card bills | Aggregating to: • ₹1,00,000 or more in cash; or • ₹10,00,000 or more by any other mode |
Banking company, co-operative bank, or credit card issuing institution |
| 5 | Receipt for acquiring bonds or debentures issued by company/institution | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more in a FY | Company or institution issuing bonds/debentures |
| 6 | Receipt for acquiring shares (including share application money) | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more in a FY | Company issuing shares |
| 7 | Buy-back of shares from any person (other than open market purchases) | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more in a FY | Listed company purchasing own securities u/s 68 of Companies Act |
| 8 | Receipt for sale of foreign currency, forex cards, traveller's cheques, drafts | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more (with PAN) / ₹5 Lakh or more (without PAN) in a FY | Authorised Person under Section 2(c) of FEMA, 1999 |
| 9 | Purchase, sale, gift, or Joint Development Agreement (JDA) of immovable property | Transaction value or Stamp Duty Value (SDV) of ₹45 Lakh or more | Inspector-General, Registrar, or Sub-Registrar under Registration Act, 1908 |
| 10 | Purchase of stamp paper by any person | ₹2 Lakh or more (with PAN) / ₹1 Lakh or more (without PAN) in one transaction | Stock Holding Corporation of India Limited (SHCIL) |
| 11 | Receipt against insurance premium | Aggregating to ₹10 Lakh or more (with PAN) / ₹5 Lakh or more (without PAN) in a FY | Insurer as defined in Section 2(9) of Insurance Act, 1938 |
| 12 | Cash receipt for sale of goods or services of any nature (other than 1 to 11) | Amount exceeding ₹2,00,000 | Any person liable for tax audit under Section 63 (Old 44AB) |
Information for Pre-filling Return of Income [Rule 237(6)]
To facilitate seamless automated pre-filling of returns, the following information must be furnished on an ongoing basis:
- Capital Gains on Listed Securities / Mutual Funds: All transactions reported by Stock Exchanges, Depositories, Clearing Corporations, and RTAs.
- Dividend Income: All dividend payments reported by companies.
- Interest Income: All accounts where interest exceeds zero in a financial year (excluding PM Jan Dhan Accounts) reported by banks, post offices, and NBFCs.
Fees & Penalties for SFT Defaults [Sections 427(3), 454, 455]
| Default Type | Governing Section | Quantum of Fee / Penalty | Maximum Ceiling |
|---|---|---|---|
| Failure to furnish SFT by due date (31st May) | Sec 427(3) / 508(1) | ₹200 per day for every day default continues | Max ₹1,00,000 |
| Failure to furnish SFT within notice period u/s 508(7) | Sec 454 / 508(7) | ₹1,000 per day starting after notice expiry | Max ₹1,00,000 |
| Furnishing Inaccurate SFT or Due Diligence Failure | Sec 455(1) | ₹50,000 lump sum penalty | Fixed ₹50,000 |
| Reporting Financial Institution (RFI) Account Inaccuracies | Sec 455(2) | ₹5,000 for each inaccurate reportable account (in addition to Sec 455(1)) | ₹5,000 × No. of accounts |
Where a reporting financial institution pays penalty under Section 455(2) caused by false/inaccurate information furnished by an account holder, the institution is legally entitled to:
(a) Recover the sum so paid on behalf of such reportable account holder; or
(b) Retain an amount equal to the penalty out of moneys in its possession or coming to it from that account holder.
A private bank has not filed its Statement of Financial Transactions (SFT) in relation to specified transactions for the financial year 2026-27 by the statutory due date (31st May 2027).
A notice was issued by the prescribed income-tax authority on 1st October, 2027 requiring the bank to furnish the statement by 31st October, 2027.
The bank, however, furnished the statement only on 15th November, 2027.
What would be the amount of fee and penalty leviable with respect to such defaults?
Statutory Solution & Computation:
| Non-Compliance | Fee / Penalty Provision | Relevant Period | Quantum of Levy |
|---|---|---|---|
| Section 508(1) | Fee of ₹200 per day of continuing default [Sec 427(3)] | 01.06.2027 to 31.10.2027 (153 days) | 153 days × ₹200 = ₹30,600 |
| Section 508(7) | Penalty of ₹1,000 per day of continuing default [Sec 454] | 01.11.2027 to 15.11.2027 (15 days) | 15 days × ₹1,000 = ₹15,000 |
| Total Fee and Penalty Payable | ₹45,600 | ||
Note: Under Section 470, no penalty under Section 454 shall be leviable if the bank proves that there was reasonable cause for the failure.
Section 509: Reporting Transactions in Crypto-Assets (Old Sec 285BAA)
Section 509 read with Rule 243 mandates crypto-asset service providers and exchanges to furnish an annual statement of transactions in crypto-assets on or before 31st May following the relevant calendar year to the Director / Joint Director of Income-tax (Intelligence and Criminal Investigation).
• Delay in filing statement: ₹200 per day during continuing default.
• Inaccurate reporting or due diligence failure: ₹50,000 penalty.
(For complete operational mechanics of VDAs and taxation, see Chapter 12: Digital Transactions & VDAs).
Section 510: Annual Information Statement (AIS) & Taxpayer Information Summary (Old Sec 285BB)
Section 510 read with Rule 245 provides the statutory foundation for the Annual Information Statement (AIS). The Director General of Income-tax (Systems) is required to upload in the registered electronic portal account of the assessee an annual statement in Form No. 168 within 90 days from the end of the month in which information is received.
Statutory Components of AIS [Rule 245 Table]
In addition, AIS captures pending assessment/penalty proceedings (Category 5), completed proceedings (Category 6), and data received from foreign jurisdictions under bilateral exchange of information agreements (Section 159 / DTAAs).
Sections 512 to 536 encompass the administrative machinery governing taxpayer representation, professional valuers, naming of defaulters, statutory indemnity, CBDT rule-making powers, faceless schemes, and transitional repeal-and-savings mechanisms under the Income-tax Act, 2025.
Section 512: Publication of Names of Certain Tax Defaulters (Old Sec 287)
Where the Central Government is of the opinion that it is necessary or expedient in the public interest, it may publish the names of any assessees and particulars relating to any proceedings or prosecutions in the Official Gazette or media.
No publication shall be made in respect of any penalty imposed until:
- The time allowed for filing an appeal to the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or Commissioner (Appeals) has expired without an appeal being filed; or
- Where an appeal has been filed, the appeal has been finally heard and disposed of.
Publication of Connected Persons: If the assessee is a firm, company, or AOP, names of partners, directors, secretaries, or managers may also be published if facts justify.
Sections 513 & 514: Appearance by Registered Valuers & Registration (Old Sec 287A)
Under Section 513, an assessee entitled or required to attend before any income-tax authority or the Appellate Tribunal in matters relating to the valuation of any asset may attend through a Registered Valuer.
• Register of Valuers: Maintained by the Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Director General.
• Mandatory Declaration: Every applicant valuer must undertake to conduct impartial and true valuation, charge fees within prescribed ceilings, and never undertake valuation of any asset in which he has any direct or indirect interest.
• Personal Appearance Exception: Appearance through a valuer is NOT permitted where the assessee is required to appear personally for examination on oath or affirmation under Section 246.
Section 515: Appearance by Authorised Representative (AR) (Old Sec 288)
An assessee required or entitled to attend before any Income-tax Authority or the Appellate Tribunal in connection with any proceeding may appear through an Authorised Representative (AR) authorised in writing, except when personal appearance is required for examination on oath under Section 246.
Persons Qualified to Act as Authorised Representative
Disqualifications of an Accountant to Act as AR
To ensure professional independence, the following persons cannot act as an Accountant for representation:
| Assessee Category | Persons Disqualified from Acting as Accountant |
|---|---|
| Company |
Persons ineligible to be auditor under Section 141(3) of Companies Act 2013:
• Body corporate (other than LLP); • Officer or employee of the company; • Partner or employee of an officer/employee; • Person / relative / partner holding securities (relative may hold up to ₹1,000 face value); • Indebted in excess of ₹5 Lakh; or gave guarantee in excess of ₹1 Lakh; • Person having business relationships (Rule 253); • Relative is director or KMP; • Holding auditor appointments in more than 20 companies; • Convicted of fraud within last 10 years; • Entity rendering prohibited services under Section 144 of Companies Act. |
| Individual | The assessee himself or his relative. |
| Firm / LLP | Partner of the firm or his relative. |
| HUF / AOP | Member of the HUF / AOP or his relative. |
| Trust / Institution |
• Author, founder, or substantial contributor (> ₹1 Lakh in FY or aggregate > ₹10 Lakh) or relative;
• Trustee or manager or relative of trustee/manager. |
General Disqualifications from Being an Authorised Representative [Section 515(4)]
- Dismissed Government Servant: Dismissed or removed from Government service — permanently disqualified forever.
- Convicted of Tax Offence / Penalty: Convicted of an offence connected with tax proceedings or penalised under the Act (other than u/s 465(1)(d)) — disqualified for period determined by PCCIT/CCIT/PCIT.
- Insolvent: Disqualified for the entire duration of insolvency.
- Convicted of Fraud: Convicted of an offence involving fraud — disqualified for 10 years from date of conviction.
Misconduct & Disciplinary Proceedings [Section 515(5)-(6)]
Where an accountant (CA) or advocate is found guilty of professional misconduct by their regulatory institute (ICAI or Bar Council), any disciplinary order cancelling their right to practice automatically extinguishes their right to appear before income-tax authorities.
For other representatives, the prescribed authority may pass an order of disqualification after giving an opportunity of being heard. The representative has a right of appeal to the CBDT within 1 month, and the disqualification order takes effect only after 1 month or disposal of appeal.
Sections 516, 517 & 518: Rounding Off, Statutory Receipts & Indemnity
| Section | Subject Matter | Statutory Rule |
|---|---|---|
| Section 516 (Old 288A & 288B) | Rounding Off of Total Income, Tax & Refund |
Computed total income, tax payable, interest, penalty, or refund shall be rounded off to the nearest multiple of ₹10.
• First ignore paise; • If the last digit is 5 or more → round UP to next multiple of 10; • If the last digit is less than 5 → round DOWN to next lower multiple of 10. |
| Section 517 | Receipt to be Given for Payments | A formal receipt shall be given for any money paid or recovered under this Act. |
| Section 518 (Old 290) | Statutory Indemnity | Every person deducting, retaining, or paying any tax in pursuance of this Act in respect of income belonging to another person (e.g. TDS deductor, representative assessee) shall be indemnified against all third-party actions and civil liabilities. |
Sections 526, 528, 529 & 530: General Administrative Powers & Legal Shield
Sections 532, 533 & 534: Faceless Schemes, CBDT Rule-Making & Parliamentary Laying
Section 532 empowers the Central Government to notify faceless and digital tax schemes to eliminate physical interface and optimise efficiency through economies of scale.
The CBDT is empowered, subject to the control of the Central Government, to make the Income-tax Rules, 2026.
Rules cover computation methods, perquisite valuation, depreciation rates, PAN procedures, return forms, audit reports, DTAA procedures, and estimation of indeterminate income.
Retrospective Rules [Sec 533(3)]: Rules can be given retrospective effect from a date not earlier than commencement of the Act, provided they do not prejudicially affect the interests of assessees unless expressly permitted by the statute.
Every rule made under the Act, rules framed by ITAT u/s 364, and notifications issued shall be laid before each House of Parliament as soon as possible for a total period of 30 days (in one or successive sessions). Modifications by Parliament take effect prospectively without invalidating earlier actions.
Section 535: Power to Remove Statutory Difficulties (Old Sec 298)
If any difficulty arises in giving effect to the provisions of the Income-tax Act, 2025, the Central Government may, by general or special order, make provisions or adaptations not inconsistent with the Act.
No order for removal of difficulties shall be made after the expiry of 3 years from 1st April, 2026 (i.e. sunset date: 31st March, 2029). Every order must be laid before Parliament.
Section 536: Repeal of the 1961 Act & Statutory Savings Provisions (Old Sec 297)
Section 536(1) formally repeals the Income-tax Act, 1961. To guarantee a seamless statutory transition without legal vacuum or tax leakage, Section 536(2) read with Section 6 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 enacts comprehensive savings:
| Subject Area | Transitional Saving Mechanism under Section 536 |
|---|---|
| Earlier Actions & Orders | Previous operation of 1961 Act and all orders, rights, privileges, obligations, or liabilities acquired/accrued are fully saved. |
| Pending & Past Assessments | All proceedings pending on 01.04.2026 or initiated on/after 01.04.2026 for tax years beginning before 01.04.2026 continue under the procedure of the repealed 1961 Act. |
| Past Penalties & Appeals | Penalties for pre-2026 years initiated/imposed under 1961 Act. Pending appeals before ITAT, High Courts, and Supreme Court continue unaffected. |
| Elections & Options | Options, declarations, and elections exercised under 1961 Act deemed exercised under corresponding provisions of 2025 Act. |
| Tax Credits (MAT / AMT) | Unabsorbed tax credits under Sections 115JAA / 115JD of 1961 Act eligible for carry forward and credit under Section 206 of the 2025 Act. |
| Brought Forward Losses |
Losses brought forward from pre-2026 tax years carried forward and set off under 2025 Act:
• House property loss (Sec 71B → 8 years); • Business loss (Sec 72 → 8 years); • Speculation loss (Sec 73 → 4 years); • Specified business loss (Sec 73A → indefinite); • Race horse loss (Sec 74A → 4 years); • Capital losses (Sec 74 → 8 years from year first computed). |
| Unabsorbed Allowances & Deductions | Unabsorbed depreciation u/s 32(2) and capital expenditure on scientific research u/s 35(4) added to capital allowances under 2025 Act. Deductions u/s 35D, 35DDA, 35E, 36(1)(viia) bad debt provision continue smoothly. |
| Pending Searches & Requisitions | Searches initiated u/s 132 or requisitions u/s 132A prior to 01.04.2026 continue under the provisions of the repealed 1961 Act. |
Comprehensive solutions to all 7 practical problem questions from the ICAI Direct Tax study module, incorporating statutory references, monetary thresholds, and authoritative judicial precedents.
Fearless General Finance & Investment Limited, a residuary non-banking company, accepts public deposits, issues deposit certificates and repays the same after some period of time along with interest, under different schemes run by it. Following transactions were noted from their books of account:
(i) Mr. A, an individual, has deposited ₹15,000 on 1st May, 2026 for 48 months by bearer cheque and another ₹15,000 on 30th June, 2026 in cash to purchase a new certificate of 48 months tenure.
(ii) Mr. A has applied for premature withdrawal against both the certificates and the company has paid him ₹16,500, by a bearer cheque, against principal and interest on 23rd March, 2027, due against his first certificate (purchased in May 2026) and ₹15,500 in cash on 25th March, 2027, against the second certificate.
Discuss the violation of income tax provisions, if any, and consequential penalty for each transaction. Will it make any difference if the certificates were held by Mr. A with his wife Mrs. A, jointly, while repaying back in cash or bearer cheque?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
(i) Acceptance of Deposits [Section 185 (Old Sec 269SS)]:
- First Deposit (01.05.2026): Deposit of ₹15,000 by bearer cheque does not exceed the threshold limit of ₹20,000. Hence, there is no violation of Section 185 at the time of accepting the first deposit.
- Second Deposit (30.06.2026): On the date of taking the second deposit in cash of ₹15,000, there is already an earlier unpaid deposit of ₹15,000 remaining outstanding. The fresh deposit of ₹15,000 takes the aggregate outstanding deposit to ₹30,000, which exceeds the threshold limit of ₹20,000.
- Consequence: Violation of Section 185 is attracted. Penalty under Section 450 / 471 equal to the amount of deposit taken (₹15,000) is leviable on the company.
(ii) Repayment of Deposits [Section 188 (Old Sec 269T)]:
- First Repayment (23.03.2027): Company paid ₹16,500 by bearer cheque. On that date, the aggregate amount of deposits held by Mr. A with the company (together with interest payable) is ₹16,500 + ₹15,500 = ₹32,000, which exceeds ₹20,000. Repaying by bearer cheque violates Section 188 (which requires an account payee cheque/draft or ECS). Consequential penalty under Section 453 / 475 equal to ₹16,500 is attracted.
- Second Repayment (25.03.2027): Paid ₹15,500 in cash. On this date, the first certificate has already been repaid and ceased to exist. Neither the amount repaid with interest (₹15,500) nor the aggregate deposits held by Mr. A on that date exceeds ₹20,000. Hence, the second repayment in cash does NOT violate Section 188.
Impact of Joint Holding with Wife:
It will make no difference even if the certificates were held by Mr. A in joint names with his wife Mrs. A. Section 188 expressly aggregates deposits held by such person “either in his own name or jointly with any other person” on the date of repayment. The violation and penalty on the first repayment stand confirmed.
The proceedings before the Income-tax Authorities either can be attended by the assessee in person or through an authorized representative. Who can be treated as an authorized representative of the assessee? Mention any five persons who can be treated as an authorized representative of the assessee.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
As per Section 515 (Old Sec 288), any assessee who is entitled or required to attend before any Income-tax Authority or the Appellate Tribunal may attend through an Authorised Representative, being a person authorised by the assessee in writing to appear on his behalf.
Any five persons who can act as an Authorised Representative are:
- Relative or Regular Employee: A person who is a relative or a regular employee of the assessee;
- Officer of Scheduled Bank: Any officer of a Scheduled Bank with which the assessee maintains a current account or has other regular business dealings;
- Legal Practitioner: A legal practitioner / advocate entitled to practice in any Civil Court in India;
- Accountant (Chartered Accountant): A Chartered Accountant within the meaning of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949 holding a valid Certificate of Practice (COP), who is not otherwise disqualified;
- Recognised Accountancy Examination Pass: Any person who has passed any accountancy examination recognized in this behalf by the CBDT (Rule 251).
Exception: AR representation is not permitted where the assessee is required to appear personally for examination on oath or affirmation under Section 246.
An order for T.Y. 2026-27 was passed by the Assessing Officer as per section 270, but the typist wrongly typed in the order, the tax year as T.Y. 2025-26. The assessee claimed in appeal that the same is an invalid order which was not accepted by the CIT (Appeals) on the ground of the error being of clerical nature. Discuss the correctness of the order of the CIT(Appeals).
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
Section 522 (Old Sec 292B) provides that no return of income, assessment order, notice, summons, or other proceeding furnished, made, or issued in pursuance of any provision of the Act shall be invalid or deemed invalid merely by reason of any mistake, defect, or omission, if such order, notice, or proceeding is in substance and effect in conformity with or according to the intent and purpose of this Act.
A clerical or typographical error cannot invalidate an otherwise substantive assessment order. In the given case, while the typist inadvertently wrote T.Y. 2025-26 in the heading, the entire computation, facts, and subject-matter of the order pertained to T.Y. 2026-27.
Therefore, the order was in substance and effect in conformity with the Act. The typographical error does not render the order invalid. The action of the CIT(Appeals) in rejecting the assessee's objection is fully valid and correct in law.
“Proceedings cannot be initiated under the Act, unless a proper notice to this effect has been served upon.” In this context answer:
(i) What are the prescribed modes of service of such notice?
(ii) On whom should the notice be addressed and served upon in the cases where the assessee is a dissolved firm and a partitioned HUF?
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
(i) Prescribed Modes of Service [Section 501 (Old Sec 282)]:
- By post (registered/speed post) or such courier services as approved by the CBDT; or
- In such manner as provided in the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for service of summons; or
- In the form of any electronic record as provided in Chapter IV of the Information Technology Act, 2000; or
- By any other means of transmission of documents provided by rules made by the CBDT (Rule 127).
(ii) Person upon Whom Notice Must Be Served [Section 503 (Old Sec 283)]:
| Status of Assessee | Person upon Whom Notice Must Be Addressed & Served |
|---|---|
| A Dissolved Firm | Any person who was a partner (not being a minor) immediately before dissolution. |
| A Partitioned HUF | On the last Manager (Karta) of the HUF, or, if he is dead, then on all adult members of the erstwhile HUF immediately before the partition. |
Explain the circumstances under which the Assessing Officer can resort to provisional attachment of the property of the assessee. Also, state the period of time for which such attachment can take place.
When can the Assessing Officer revoke provisional attachment of property? Discuss.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
Circumstances for Provisional Attachment [Section 500 (Old Sec 281B)]:
- Pending Proceeding: During the pendency of any proceeding for the assessment of income or for assessment/reassessment of escaped income, OR for imposition of penalty under Section 444 (false entry in books) where penalty likely to exceed ₹2 Crores.
- Protection of Revenue: The Assessing Officer must form an opinion that provisional attachment is necessary to protect the interest of Revenue.
- Prior Supervisory Approval: The AO must obtain the previous approval of the Principal Chief Commissioner / Chief Commissioner / Principal Commissioner / Commissioner / Director General.
- Order in Writing: The AO may, by written order, attach provisionally any property belonging to the assessee in the manner provided in Section 413.
Duration of Provisional Attachment:
Provisional attachment remains valid for 6 months from the date of the order. The Competent Authority may extend the period for reasons recorded in writing, but total extension cannot exceed 2 years or 60 days after the date of assessment/reassessment order, whichever is later.
Revocation of Provisional Attachment:
- The AO shall revoke attachment where the assessee furnishes a bank guarantee from a scheduled bank for an amount not less than the Fair Market Value (FMV) of the attached property (or for a lower sum if AO is satisfied revenue is protected).
- Time Limit for Revocation Order: The revocation order must be passed within 15 days of receiving the guarantee (or within 45 days if reference was made to the Valuation Officer to estimate FMV).
- The AO shall also release the guarantee forthwith if satisfied that it is no longer required to protect revenue.
Mr. Biswas, a stock broker, has defaulted with regard to his income-tax payments and the Assessing Officer has attached his membership card of Stock Exchange under section 500 of the Income-tax Act, 2025. Mr. Biswas contends that the membership card is not transferable and is not his personal asset. Discuss the validity of attachment of the card by the Assessing Officer in the context of Section 500.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
The right of membership in a Stock Exchange is not a private alienable asset belonging to the member; it is merely a personal privilege granted to him.
- The membership card is non-transferable and incapable of alienation by the member or his legal representatives, except to the limited extent provided under the rules and regulations of the Stock Exchange.
- Nomination, even if permitted, is not automatic and is subject to absolute discretion and rules of the Stock Exchange. Upon death or default of a member, the right of nomination vests absolutely in the Stock Exchange.
Because the membership card is a personal privilege and not the private alienable property of the assessee, it cannot be attached under Section 500.
This proposition was settled by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Stock Exchange, Ahmedabad v. ACIT (2001) 248 ITR 209 (SC).
Therefore, the contention of Mr. Biswas is correct, and the action of the Assessing Officer in attaching the membership card is invalid in law.
An assessee had credited a sum of ₹50,000 in cash in the account of Madan, said to represent a loan obtained from him. The Assessing Officer, having gone into the genuineness of the transaction, disbelieved the story of loan and treated the sum of ₹50,000 as the income of the assessee from undisclosed sources. He also started proceedings under section 450 and levied a penalty of ₹60,000 on the assessee for having accepted the loan in contravention of section 185. Examine the correctness of the levy.
Statutory Analysis & Solution:
The action of the Assessing Officer is incorrect in law on two distinct grounds:
1. Penalty Exceeds Statutory Maximum Limit:
Under Section 450 / 471 (Old Sec 271D), the penalty leviable for contravention of Section 185 cannot exceed a sum equal to the amount of loan so taken or accepted. Since the alleged loan taken was ₹50,000, the maximum penalty permissible under law is ₹50,000. Imposing a penalty of ₹60,000 is patently illegal and beyond statutory jurisdiction.
2. Mutual Exclusivity and Self-Contradictory Stand:
The Assessing Officer cannot blow hot and cold simultaneously. On the one hand, the AO disbelieved the genuineness of the loan and assessed ₹50,000 as undisclosed income (cash credit) of the assessee. On the other hand, the AO levied penalty for accepting a loan in contravention of Section 185.
The moment the amount of ₹50,000 is treated and taxed as the assessee's undisclosed income, it ceases to bear the character of a loan. Consequently, the very foundation for the levy of penalty under Section 185 read with Section 450 disappears!
In Diwan Enterprises v. CIT and Others (2000) 246 ITR 571 (Delhi High Court), it was held that treating an amount as undisclosed income and simultaneously levying penalty for accepting it as a loan is self-contradictory. The penalty order cannot stand.
Hence, the levy of penalty of ₹60,000 is completely unsustainable in law.